Re: Review Request 127729: Explicitly define NOMINMAX to avoid conflict with the 'max' macro definition

2016-04-23 Thread Andrius da Costa Ribas
> On Abril 23, 2016, 11:40 p.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > This is a duplicate of RR 127598, which is about to get marked as 'change > > then commit' (I missed that it was updated a few days ago when my email was > > futzy :( ). Thanks! I'm discarding this one, then. - Andrius da Costa

Re: Review Request 127729: Explicitly define NOMINMAX to avoid conflict with the 'max' macro definition

2016-04-23 Thread Andrius da Costa Ribas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127729/ --- (Updated Abril 23, 2016, 11:54 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 127729: Explicitly define NOMINMAX to avoid conflict with the 'max' macro definition

2016-04-23 Thread Michael Pyne
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127729/#review94797 --- This is a duplicate of RR 127598, which is about to get

Review Request 127729: Explicitly define NOMINMAX to avoid conflict with the 'max' macro definition

2016-04-23 Thread Andrius da Costa Ribas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127729/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and kdewin. Repository: kcoreaddons