On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 07:35 -0500, Collin Kidder wrote:
> Apparently no one thought to mention that the graphic was too
> close to FCP until the very end. This is quite unfortunate.
Of course it was unfortunate.
--
Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
> Dear Mads,
>
> The registered logo issue is a legal issue.
> The discussions are not at stake.
>
> There are plenty of things to do,
> except taking FCP logo and modifying it.
>
> Cinephilac is free to submit ANY logo,
> except Casablanca, adobe, avid, pinnacle, and so l
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:27 +0100, Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote:
>
> Please note that this is not about the validity of your arguments
> about the
> icon. Its about making sure that we ensure the continued involvment
> of
> contributors, and ensure that key members (such as you) provide
> guidanc
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:27 +0100, Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote:
> Now, I know that Cinephiliac is a proud Australian, and I am sure that
> he will
> just grab a Foster (or whatever passes for beer an Australia/Canada
> these
> days), and continue his efforts with Kdenlive! But IMHO any serious
>
fredag 19 December 2008 skrev Jean-Michel Pouré:
> > The question is, what is the best process that encourages people to
> > commit their time and energy to the project we all want to see
> > succeed?
>
> Kdenlive has plenty of valuable projects for non-programming folks:
[list of stuff to do dele
> The question is, what is the best process that encourages people to
> commit their time and energy to the project we all want to see
> succeed?
Kdenlive has plenty of valuable projects for non-programming folks:
* Write good and accurate documentation,
* Screencast short 10s to 2min tutorials,
*
Hey guys,
Thanks for the support Mads, and thanks for caring enough to argue your case
JMP (the new template looks great, btw). I think honestly what's missing here
is actual team discussion / system. I'm not even just talking about if it
should be one specific logo or not, so much as having so
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:51 +0100, Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
> I changed my mind after not being able to bluild static versions of
> MLT
> + FFmpeg. Kind regards, JMP
Sorry, I meant packages ... not logo.
--
SF.Net email
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 13:04 +0100, Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote:
> I think your assement of the situation is wrong. I am not prepared to
> make an
> issue out of it, however.
I changed my mind after not being able to bluild static versions of MLT
+ FFmpeg. Kind regards, JMP
-
onsdag 17 December 2008 skrev Jean-Michel Pouré:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 11:23 +0100, Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote:
> > However, I still think that Cinephiliacs icon is sufficiently
> > different from
> > the other icons to work in a menu with them, and I truly do not think
> > that
> > Apple will
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 11:23 +0100, Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote:
> However, I still think that Cinephiliacs icon is sufficiently
> different from
> the other icons to work in a menu with them, and I truly do not think
> that
> Apple will ever sue the Kdenlive Community for using an icon that
> loo
11 matches
Mail list logo
