Re: [Kdenlive-devel] movit integration

Le 16/12/2013 00:20, Martin Sandsmark a écrit : >> I believe that JBM began last summer to integrate QGLSL monitor (partly >> taken from Dan's Shotcut) at the same time he was switching to >> refactored architecture. > I assume that's what is in commit 072944c9530f5d7b077d72e48532f9e74e6e1b7f. >>

Re: [Kdenlive-devel] movit integration

Le lundi 16 décembre 2013 22:09:36, Till Theato a écrit : > You might want to search the mailing archive for the related threads at > the time (mainly spring/summer 2012) or have a look at the blog posts. Hello, I took time to digg back into blog & sf list archive (not convenient!)... It was good

Re: [Kdenlive-devel] movit integration

On 12/16/2013 08:44 AM, Jean-Nicolas Artaud wrote: > > > > 2013/12/16 Martin Sandsmark > > > Hi! > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:17:43PM +0100, Vincent PINON wrote: > > I believe that JBM began last summer to integrate QGLSL monitor > (partly >

Re: [Kdenlive-devel] movit integration

2013/12/16 Martin Sandsmark > Hi! > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:17:43PM +0100, Vincent PINON wrote: > > I believe that JBM began last summer to integrate QGLSL monitor (partly > > taken from Dan's Shotcut) at the same time he was switching to > > refactored architecture. > > I assume that's what

Re: [Kdenlive-devel] movit integration

Hi! On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:17:43PM +0100, Vincent PINON wrote: > I believe that JBM began last summer to integrate QGLSL monitor (partly > taken from Dan's Shotcut) at the same time he was switching to > refactored architecture. I assume that's what is in commit 072944c9530f5d7b077d72e48532f9

Re: [Kdenlive-devel] movit integration

Hello, I believe that JBM began last summer to integrate QGLSL monitor (partly taken from Dan's Shotcut) at the same time he was switching to refactored architecture. As I reverted the repo to functional state, I have moved this work to "refactoring" branch. Probably most of it can be adapted to t