Re: [Kdenlive-devel] Release and future...

2011-09-03 Thread jb
On Friday 02 September 2011 16:45:22 Dan Dennedy wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:06 PM, jb wrote: > > On Saturday 03 September 2011 00:44:46 Till Theato wrote: > >> For the update thing to work a MLT release would be required, too. > >> @Dan? > > > > Oh, you mean because the frei0r version is n

Re: [Kdenlive-devel] Release and future...

2011-09-03 Thread jb
On Friday 02 September 2011 16:51:57 Dan Dennedy wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:06 PM, jb wrote: > > In my version, we simple put one xml copy for each version of the > > filter, and Kdenlive will only load the correct version. > > What is the comparison logic for version selection? For exampl

Re: [Kdenlive-devel] Release and future...

2011-09-03 Thread Till Theato
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/03/2011 01:45 AM, Dan Dennedy wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:06 PM, jb wrote: >> On Saturday 03 September 2011 00:44:46 Till Theato wrote: >>> For the update thing to work a MLT release would be required, >>> too. @Dan? >> >> Oh, you mean be

Re: [Kdenlive-devel] Release and future...

2011-09-03 Thread Dan Dennedy
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:05 PM, jb wrote: > 1) Change the effect XML depending on the filter version > > I did some test and managed to have a working implementation that will bring > different parameters depending on the filter version, see my last commit: > http://kdenlive.svn.sourceforge.net/vi

Re: [Kdenlive-devel] Release and future...

2011-09-03 Thread Till Theato
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/03/2011 01:06 AM, jb wrote: > On Saturday 03 September 2011 00:44:46 Till Theato wrote: > >>> 1) Change the effect XML depending on the filter version >>> >>> I did some test and managed to have a working implementation >>> that will bring diff