https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #55 from Tore Anderson ---
> In my experience Akonadi based KMail with IMAP never really worked
Assuming KMail wasn't always «Akonadi based», I would agree with this.
I used to be a happy KMail user years ago, then I upgraded my dis
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
Tore Anderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #49 from Tore Anderson ---
(In reply to Martin Steigerwald from comment #47)
> Tore, Gunther or someone else who commented here: Could you please check
> whether you still have those performance issues you reported there with
&g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371228
Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@fud.no
--
You are rec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@fud.no
--
You are rec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #46 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
By the way, if you need an IMAP account to test with, try the IETF mailing list
archives, which is available through anonymous IMAP (cf.
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/tools/trac/wik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #45 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Created attachment 106920
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=106920=edit
Temperature graph - KMail tests at 21:30-22:00 and 12:35-13:05
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #43 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Created attachment 106918
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=106918=edit
I/O throughput graph - KMail tests at 21:30-22:00 and 12:35-13:05
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #44 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Created attachment 106919
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=106919=edit
Load graph - KMail tests at 21:30-22:00 and 12:35-13:05
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #42 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Created attachment 106917
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=106917=edit
IOOPS graph - KMail tests at 21:30-22:00 and 12:35-13:05
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #41 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Created attachment 106916
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=106916=edit
CPU graph - KMail tests at 21:30-22:00 and 12:35-13:05
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #40 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Following the release of Fedora 26, I decided to test KMail again and compare
it with Mozilla Thunderbird, both using a completely empty UNIX account.
tl;dr: Compared to Thunderbird, KMail/A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #15 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Just upgraded to Fedora 24 and tried a fresh setup of KMail with two IMAP
accounts. Versions:
akonadi-1.13.0-102.fc24.x86_64
kmail-15.12.3-1.fc24.x86_64
No improvement is noticeable. Synchro
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
Tore Anderson t...@fud.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@fud.no
--- Comment #10 from
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117808
--- Additional Comments From tore fud no 2008-08-01 17:01 ---
I like the idea, so +20 from me...
A few
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117808
tore fud no changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97390
tore fud no changed:
What|Removed |Added
17 matches
Mail list logo
