https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #31 from Christophe Giboudeaux cgiboude...@gmx.com ---
b is already what is done in all the KDE modules. This bug report became noisy
for pointless reasons.
A constructive report would have been: pykde4 fails to build because of the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #27 from Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #26)
Oh and for the record: the KDE4 build system must work with CMake 2.6.4. I
That is only means that generation of KdepimLibsConfig.cmake must be refactored
(i.e.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #73694|1 |0
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Christophe Giboudeaux cgiboude...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #29 from Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #28)
Please refrain from reopening this report
You still don't realize that the problem couldn't be solved by hacking pykde
CMakeLists.txt
It is configuration problem of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #30 from Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org ---
the three possible solutions are:
a) fix boost header location in Gentoo (which is what Christophe wants us to
do). Since Gentoo still wants to support multiple concurrent Boost
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #9 from Christophe Giboudeaux cgiboude...@gmx.com ---
There's nothing to ask. Adding the boost include dir is totally wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Christophe Giboudeaux cgiboude...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|UPSTREAM|INVALID
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #11 from Johannes Huber j...@gentoo.org ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Using a correct resolution
Where is the bug id for pykde?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Michael kensing...@gentoo.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kensing...@gentoo.org
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilfri...@gentoo.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #13 from Christophe Giboudeaux cgiboude...@gmx.com ---
The idea and the patch are both wrong.
- Adding the boost include dir to kdepimlibs_include_dirs supposes that :
1/ Boost was already found,
2/ All of kdepimlibs needs boost
These two
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #14 from Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #13)
The idea and the patch are both wrong.
- Adding the boost include dir to kdepimlibs_include_dirs supposes that :
1/ Boost was already found,
yes it was! it was
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #15 from Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org ---
- Adding the boost include dir to kdepimlibs_include_dirs supposes that :
1/ Boost was already found,
From /CMakeLists.txt:
set(Boost_MINIMUM_VERSION 1.34.0)
if (WIN32)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #16 from Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #15)
OK, it's not marked as REQUIRED. Which means build takes place as well if it
is not found.
I'm in real doublt about this!
2/ All of kdepimlibs needs boost
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #17 from Christophe Giboudeaux cgiboude...@gmx.com ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
The idea and the patch are both wrong.
- Adding the boost include dir to kdepimlibs_include_dirs supposes that :
1/ Boost
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #19 from Christophe Giboudeaux cgiboude...@gmx.com ---
(In reply to comment #18)
You misunderstand what KdepimLibsConfig.cmake.in does: ${boost_include_dir}
first of all it's not ${boost_include_dir} but @Boost_INCLUDE_DIR@. latter
will
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #20 from Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #18)
You misunderstand what KdepimLibsConfig.cmake.in does:
${boost_include_dir}
first of all it's not ${boost_include_dir} but
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #21 from Christophe Giboudeaux cgiboude...@gmx.com ---
you have to choose your answer at some point:
- either you use ${Boost_INCLUDE_DIR}, then the path is not hardcoded but you
must find boost before kdepimlibs,
- or you use
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #22 from Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #21)
you have to choose your answer at some point:
- either you use ${Boost_INCLUDE_DIR}, then the path is not hardcoded but
you must find boost before kdepimlibs,
where
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #23 from Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #21)
If Gentoo is the only distribution having a problem with the KDE
buildsystem, it's the Gentoo buildsystem that needs some fixes. (and maybe
pyKDE that needs a trivial
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Christophe Giboudeaux cgiboude...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #73694|0 |1
is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #25 from Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #24)
Created attachment 73730 [details]
Test patch
/usr/include/boost-1_50 *is* a hardcoded path for a 3rd party library.
that makes a huge difference which you keep on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #26 from Christophe Giboudeaux cgiboude...@gmx.com ---
(In reply to comment #22)
And AGAIN: it is *incorrect* to use `set()` here! Build system should use
`set_and_check()` as claimed by cmake manual (do you able to read the
manual?)
Oh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Laurent Montel mon...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mon...@kde.org
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #3 from Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
We need to have your compile error.
And will not add a boost in *Config*
And in all kdepim we have:
include_directories( ${Boost_INCLUDE_DIR} )
so it's not problem
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Laurent Montel mon...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Johannes Huber j...@gentoo.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@gentoo.org
--- Comment #7
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
Christoph Feck christ...@maxiom.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christ...@maxiom.de
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306323
--- Comment #1 from Alex Turbov i.za...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 73694
-- https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=73694action=edit
add missed boost dependency, so other packages could be compiled well
--
You are receiving this mail because:
32 matches
Mail list logo
