https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372006
Bug Janitor Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372006
--- Comment #8 from Bug Janitor Service ---
Dear Bug Submitter,
This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least
15 days. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and set the bug status as REPORTED. Due to regular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372006
Justin Zobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372006
Markus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m4rkus...@web.de
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372006
--- Comment #6 from Daniel ---
Ping.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372006
--- Comment #5 from Daniel ---
I see what the soruce of the confusion is now. When I say “The only
modification required to support this in Akregator is adding the `A-IM: feed`
header” I’m referring to this patch to Syndication
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372006
--- Comment #4 from Daniel ---
Uhm, the improvement in Akregator is that supporting servers can return a feed
delta with just new and modified entries instead of the full feed based on the
request caching headers. Akregator already
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372006
--- Comment #3 from Laurent Montel ---
So what is the improvment in akregator ?
What was the bug in akregator ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372006
--- Comment #2 from Daniel ---
> Do you have patch for akregator too?
No, this one patch in Syndication is all that is needed as Akregator already
behaves as required. Well, the patch in bug 372005 is needed for this to work
on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372006
Laurent Montel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mon...@kde.org
--- Comment #1
10 matches
Mail list logo