[kmail2] [Bug 405530] no "ham" status icon

2019-03-26 Thread Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405530

--- Comment #6 from Philippe ROUBACH  ---
Created attachment 119044
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=119044=edit
a mail which is not filtered by the filter i added to manage ham mails

i have mail with "Ham" or "Unsure". there is no problem in the header.

the problem is :

if condition is ""X-bogosity" "matches regular exp" "(No) | (Ham) | (Unsure)""
and the mail satisfies the condition
then
filter does nothing instead of doing its work.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[kmail2] [Bug 405530] no "ham" status icon

2019-03-21 Thread Laurent Montel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405530

Laurent Montel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mon...@kde.org

--- Comment #5 from Laurent Montel  ---
I need an mail example as I don't understand your bug report.
You have mail without Ham or Unsure info in header ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[kmail2] [Bug 405530] no "ham" status icon

2019-03-17 Thread Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405530

--- Comment #4 from Philippe ROUBACH  ---
Created attachment 118855
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118855=edit
true ham mail handling

previous capture is an error. it is about spam mail handling.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[kmail2] [Bug 405530] no "ham" status icon

2019-03-17 Thread Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405530

Philippe ROUBACH  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Platform|Other   |openSUSE RPMs

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[kmail2] [Bug 405530] no "ham" status icon

2019-03-17 Thread Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405530

--- Comment #3 from Philippe ROUBACH  ---
Created attachment 118854
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118854=edit
ham mail handling

"gestion des indésirables" = "spam handling"
"gestion des normaux" = "ham handling"
"classer comme indésirable" = "classify as spam"
"classer comme normal" = "classify as ham"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[kmail2] [Bug 405530] no "ham" status icon

2019-03-17 Thread Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405530

Philippe ROUBACH  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|NOT A BUG   |---
 Status|RESOLVED|REPORTED

--- Comment #2 from Philippe ROUBACH  ---
i reopen this bug report.

there is an actual problem.

i encounter this problem also with spamassassin.

 i continue to report about bogofilter.

if i use "X-bogosity" "matches regular exp" "(No) | (Ham) | (Unsure)"
then
ham mails are not filtered thus are not flagged "ham" thus there is no status
icon "ham"

if i don't use any condition to filter mails
then
ham mails are filtered thus are flagged "ham" thus there is a status icon "ham"

in header of ham mail we get this:

X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.00, version=1.2.4

or

X-Bogosity: Unsure, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.500135, version=1.2.4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[kmail2] [Bug 405530] no "ham" status icon

2019-03-16 Thread Christophe Giboudeaux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405530

Christophe Giboudeaux  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|INTENTIONAL |NOT A BUG

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[kmail2] [Bug 405530] no "ham" status icon

2019-03-16 Thread Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405530

Philippe ROUBACH  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INTENTIONAL

--- Comment #1 from Philippe ROUBACH  ---
i made an error . it is a filter problem

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.