This 10.140.128.0/18 is an RFC1918 zone so he shouldn't have to worry
about what his ISP does.  He can set this zone up in his resolver
and/or forward to his authoritative server.  He could also setup a
stub zone in his resolver for this rfc1918 zone.  He can make it work
since its internal only - he is in full control.  The only question is
what is supported by what.  I understand why he doesn't want to setup
64 zones if he can help it :)

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 7:41 PM Simon <dh...@thehobsons.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Darren Ankney <darren.ank...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > AM Weisteen Per <per.weist...@telenor.no> wrote:
>
> >> I'm running a DNS server which is authoritative for an internal classless 
> >> subnet being 10.40.128.0/18 and defined in BIND as 
> >> 128-191.40.10.in-addr.arpa.
> >> Is that notation also valid for KEA 2.0.3 ?
> >> IE, may I use
> >>
> >>        "reverse-ddns" : {
> >>                "ddns-domains": [
> >>                        {
> >>                        "name": "128-191.40.10.in-addr.arpa.",
> >>            "key-name": "ddns-key.zone2",
> >>            "dns-servers": [
> >>                 {
> >>                "ip-address": "10.12.14.18"
> >>                },
> >>                {
> >>                "ip-address": "10.12.16.36"
> >>                }
> >>               ]
> >>            },
>
> > the ARM doesn't say it won't.  It doesn't say it will either.  I
> > looked around and was not able to find an RFC that specifies setting
> > up the domain the way you did.  I found this one:
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2317 that seems to suggest that
> > 0/18.128.40.10.in-addr.arpa is a standard. I saw another non-RFC that
> > suggested 0-18.128.40.10.in-addr.arpa. Whether Kea supports any of
> > that, I don't know.  I'd have to test.
>
> I wouldn’t have thought any of those would work. The DHCP server is going to 
> create the reverse address by reversing the octets and adding .in-addr.arpa. 
> That’s a limitation of the way IPv4 addressing and reverse addressing works.
>
> The key thing to bear in mind is that for BIND, the name of the zone really 
> doesn’t matter - it really doesn’t care what the zone is called. But, and 
> going from memory and it’s been a long day (and a long time since I last look 
> at this), BIND won’t use that zone for reverse DNS without “outside help”.
> The only time I’ve tried to use something similar was when trying to do 
> reverse DNS for (IIRC) a /28. It relied on setting up a zone like 
> 32-48.c.b.a.in-addr.arpa. But it only worked if “upstream” (typically your 
> ISP) creates records (PTR ?) of the form 32.c.b.a.in-addr.arpa -> 
> 32.32-48.c.b.a.in-addr.arpa and delegated 32-48.c.b.a.in-addr.arpa to your 
> server(s). Needless to say, our upstream wasn’t prepared to do this, and 
> their promises of “!just tell us any changes and we’ll do them turned out to 
> be empty once past the initial setup :-(
>
> So I think easiest way to make it work is to reconfigure BIND with the 64 /24 
> zones that make up 10.40.128.0/18 - i.e. 128.40.10.in-addr.arpa, 
> 129.40.10.in-addr.arpa, etc. Things will then happen automagically. Some 
> scripting to generate a file which you include into the config will make 
> things a bit easier.
>
>
> Simon
>
> --
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
> Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
>
> To unsubscribe visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users.
>
> Kea-users mailing list
> Kea-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
-- 
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.

To unsubscribe visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users.

Kea-users mailing list
Kea-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users

Reply via email to