Re: [Kea-users] Change in offer packet

2016-10-20 Thread Thomas Andersen
> > *From: *Kea-users on behalf of Thomas > Andersen > *Date: *Monday, 17 October 2016 at 13.56 > *To: *"kea-users@lists.isc.org" > *Subject: *[Kea-users] Change in offer packet > > > > Hi, > > >

Re: [Kea-users] Change in offer packet

2016-10-20 Thread Marcin Siodelski
etter, if it is possible to configure my way out of it. > > > > Br, > > Thomas > > > > *From: *Kea-users on behalf of Thomas > Andersen > *Date: *Monday, 17 October 2016 at 13.56 > *To: *"kea-users@lists.isc.org" > *Subject: *[Ke

Re: [Kea-users] Change in offer packet

2016-10-20 Thread Thomas Andersen
intended behavior or if it may be a bug? Or even better, if it is possible to configure my way out of it. Br, Thomas From: Kea-users on behalf of Thomas Andersen Date: Monday, 17 October 2016 at 13.56 To: "kea-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: [Kea-users] Change in offer packet Hi,

[Kea-users] Change in offer packet

2016-10-17 Thread Thomas Andersen
Hi, One of the reasons why I started using kea, is because it replies with unicast, despite the client makes a discover with bootp flag broadcast. We filter all broadcast packets to wireless clients. As far as i can see, this has changed in 1.1.0. Now it replies (OFFER) with broadcast instead o