Edward, Matt, Christopher,
Thank you all. I have found this exchange to be very usefull.
The road map that Matt provides for V2 is very helpful and helps
differentiate the two efforts. It also encourages me to subscribe to the
developers list to get a better sense of how the project is
Hi Tom,
I don't know if anyone else will agree with the following, but I
thought I'd share a few of my thoughts about (a) some distinctions
between Ptolemy and Kepler, (b) how these distinctions derive from the
differences between a system model and a scientific workflow, and (c)
what the
Edward,
Thanks for your prompt reply (over the weekend!). I'll take a closer look
at the FIR actor and the source for the R and MATLAB wrappers. I've also
been focussing on the Kepler documentation instead of the Ptolemy II
doumentation. It looks like I need to switch focus and look more
In addition to the packaging and actor library differences,
Kepler also has significant UI extensions and infrastructure
for searching actor libraries...
In some cases, there is functionality that overlaps... E.g.,
Kepler has an ontology mechanism, but we have built a somewhat
different ontology
Hi Tom,
See the Kepler/CORE mission statement at
https://kepler-project.org/users/projects-using-kepler-1/kepler-core-vision-and-mission
For information about the differences between Kepler and Ptolemy,
http://ptolemy.berkeley.edu/ptolemyII/ptIIfaq.htm#kepler says
--start--
Ptolemy
Edward and Christopher covered most of the differences between Kepler and
Ptolemy, especially with respect to the 1.0 release. The current
development version of Kepler that is leading to our 2.0 release includes a
number of additional major differences, some of which include:
1) Module-based
One thing perhaps worth emphasizing is that asking about the
difference between a building and its foundation is fraught
with difficulty. The building doesn't stand without its
foundation, but the foundation is pointless without the building...
Edward
Matt Jones wrote:
Edward and Christopher
Tom,
I can answer some of these questions...
Tom Parris wrote:
Dear Keplerites:
I have been evaluating Kepler for use in a major project. The project
will perform spatial hydrological analysis for a 30+ year time period
using monthly time steps. I should say, that at first glance, I'm
8 matches
Mail list logo