If heimdal is thread-safe, that's news to me. You shouldn't care
if the apps you plan to use are off the shelf (sounds that way).
Recent snapshots have explicit concurrency support -- I'm not sure
which, if any, of the releases include this.
-- Luke
--
Frank Cusack wrote:
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 10:55:49 +0800 sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I m not sure which kerberos I should use. With Heimdal, it is a
thread-safe implementation, while MIT's kerberos is not.
Please correct me if I m wrong, it appears that there is more
applicatoins support
On Oct 4, 2004, at 01:40, Frank Cusack wrote:
Heimdal does not have a functioning replay cache, so if your app
needs that you must go with MIT.
If heimdal is thread-safe, that's news to me. You shouldn't care
if the apps you plan to use are off the shelf (sounds that way).
MIT's use of a replay
Luke == Luke Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If heimdal is thread-safe, that's news to me. You shouldn't
care if the apps you plan to use are off the shelf (sounds that
way).
Luke Recent snapshots have explicit concurrency support -- I'm
Luke not sure which, if any, of
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 01:09:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Luke Recent snapshots have explicit concurrency support -- I'm
Luke not sure which, if any, of the releases include this.
As do recent snapshots of MIt Kerberos; the upcoming 1.4 release will
include this work.
This is
On Oct 4, 2004, at 9:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 22:40:50 -0700
From: Frank Cusack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Heimdal or MIT kerberos
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
Message: 2
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Raeburn) wrote:
On Oct 4, 2004, at 01:40, Frank Cusack wrote:
Heimdal does not have a functioning replay cache, so if your app
needs that you must go with MIT.
If heimdal is thread-safe, that's news to me. You shouldn't care
if
