trying to delete from osx

2006-08-15 Thread paul paluskas
I have Kerberos pop up box asking to be installed and needs a pass word. I have no use of this program but am unable to delete the files or stop the box from coming up. Can you help ? Thank You for your time and support Respectfully Paul Paluskas [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problems with kpropd

2006-08-15 Thread Mike Dopheide
I'm stumped. I still think there's something inconsistent with the hostname, /etc/hosts, and/or DNS, but I'm not sure what else to suggest. -Mike Mike Dopheide wrote: Hhmm.. okay. First of all, you don't want to have the same keys in krb5.keytab on both systems. A system should really

Re: trying to delete from osx

2006-08-15 Thread Alexandra Ellwood
On Aug 14, 2006, at 11:59 PM, paul paluskas wrote: I have Kerberos pop up box asking to be installed and needs a pass word. I have no use of this program but am unable to delete the files or stop the box from coming up. Can you help ? Kerberos for Macintosh ships with Mac OS X. As a

Re: PAM hangs after authenticating against 2003 AD

2006-08-15 Thread Sensei
On 2006-08-10 15:41:52 +0200, Jesper Angelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I have trimmed down the configs heavily, so now I still can't login, but at least I get a login incorrect. Lets see... Clear the auth log and login as I said /locally/ with a /pure/ /local/ user. See what happens working

Re: MITKRB-SA-2006-001: multiple local privilege escalation vulnerabilities

2006-08-15 Thread Tom Yu
Tom == Tom Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom This sounds like a bug in the patch. Try moving the krb5_seteuid(0) Tom call to before the if-statement (so its return value gets Tom ignored... this is safe for seteuid(0) but not for seteuid(not_zero)). Tom I think the krb5_seteuid(0) call is to

Re: MITKRB-SA-2006-001: multiple local privilege escalation vulnerabilities

2006-08-15 Thread Sachin Punadikar
Tom, I tried code changes suggested by you, and it works fine. Now it is working as it was working before. Thanks a lot. - Sachin. On 8/16/06, Tom Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom == Tom Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom This sounds like a bug in the patch. Try moving the krb5_seteuid(0)

kdc_timesync

2006-08-15 Thread preetam R
Hi, As I under from the kerberos admin guide, the option, kdc_timesync enables the kerberos client to make up for the time difference between its system time and kdc's time. But, then does this mean that even the application server must also be in sync with kdc's time. Since, the timestamp