Hi all,
Last week remain to the beginning of European AFS Kerberos Conference.
This is an essential information update for everyone who still hesitate to
register
for upcoming event.
The organization team proudly announce following great conference news:
- Early registration rates
Hi
I have an odd situation and I am wondering if anyone on the list has
done this before or has any suggestions.
I am setting up an international network of servers in various countries
that will have local staff authenticating against a local realm
(XX.EXAMPLE.COM) for daily activities.
I
Hello.
I've had a hilariously fun day so far, so I need to pick your brains
so to speak.
When our Kerberos V5 system was setup on FC 8, for reasons quite
unknown, the ticket maxlife was set to 1 days. Sometime early
this morning (today + 1 days) = 2038 bug date and the kerberos
ticket
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 15:36 -0400, Tom Parker wrote:
My question therefor is: Is there a way to run a single KDC with two
realms, One as master for XX.EXAMPLE.COM and one as slave for
EXAMPLE.COM? And if not, how would you solve this?
It is possible for a single MIT krb5 KDC process to
On 09/03/2010 04:40 PM, Greg Hudson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 15:36 -0400, Tom Parker wrote:
My question therefor is: Is there a way to run a single KDC with two
realms, One as master for XX.EXAMPLE.COM and one as slave for
EXAMPLE.COM? And if not, how would you solve this?
It is
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 13:00 -0400, Tucks wrote:
Does anyone have any idea how to force through the new ticket expiry
change? According to all the documentation I've read, it should be
good, but isn't. I've probably missed something trivial.
No propagation should be necessary between the
* Tom Parker (tpar...@cbnco.com) wrote:
I am trying to avoid the need for a 3rd authentication server at my
remote sites (XX.EXAMPLE.COM master and slave + EXAMPLE.COM slave)
Have you considered just running multiple kdc processes..? I'd think
you could do more than one on a single box, but
