Re: Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-31 Thread Ken Raeburn
On Oct 30, 2006, at 19:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To follow up, I started pulling out references to IPV6 and INET6 whenever they caused make to fail. Now I'm getting the following errors in addrinfo-test.c: That's just a test program to compare the fake version of getaddrinfo in our tree

Re: Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-31 Thread Danny Mayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To follow up, I started pulling out references to IPV6 and INET6 whenever they caused make to fail. Now I'm getting the following errors in addrinfo-test.c: making all in tests/resolve... make[2]: Entering directory `/zircon/opt/krb5-1.5.1/src/tests/resolve' gcc

Re: Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-30 Thread tomaddox
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: I don't know if Solaris 6 has a definition of `IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT', but on a Solaris 10 system here I can see it in `/usr/include/netinet/in.h': | % pwd | /usr/include | % gfgrep -r IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT . | ./netinet/in.h: * Note: Macros IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT and

Re: Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-30 Thread Ken Raeburn
On Oct 26, 2006, at 23:06, Tom Maddox wrote: Well, upgrading isn't completely out of the question, but it'll be more painful for sure. I'll mail you some 2.6 CDs if that will help with testing. :) Naw, you'd still have to convince us to expend a machine on Solaris 2.6... :-) What you see

Re: Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-30 Thread Ken Raeburn
On Oct 27, 2006, at 13:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't *really* blame MIT for not testing compatibility with a decade-old Solaris release, but I do wish they'd included a configure option for disabling ipv6. We used to, but having more knobs than we want, we got rid of it. However, the

Re: Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-30 Thread tomaddox
To follow up, I started pulling out references to IPV6 and INET6 whenever they caused make to fail. Now I'm getting the following errors in addrinfo-test.c: making all in tests/resolve... make[2]: Entering directory `/zircon/opt/krb5-1.5.1/src/tests/resolve' gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\Kerberos\ 5\

Re: Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-27 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:39:49 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 26 Oct 2006 14:18:21 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using gcc version 3.4.6 (Sunfreeware package) and GNU ld 2.11.2. If I run it with Sun's compiler, the configure fails with the following errors in

Re: Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 26 Oct 2006 14:18:21 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, everyone, I'm trying to compile MIT's Kerberos V (krb5-1.5.1) on SPARC Solaris 2.6, and it keeps blowing up. At the moment, I'm using the GNU tools to do the build, since Sun's compiler won't take the arguments that configure wants

Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-26 Thread tomaddox
Hi, everyone, I'm trying to compile MIT's Kerberos V (krb5-1.5.1) on SPARC Solaris 2.6, and it keeps blowing up. At the moment, I'm using the GNU tools to do the build, since Sun's compiler won't take the arguments that configure wants to give it. My configure command line is: # configure

Re: Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-26 Thread Marcus Watts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm using gcc version 3.4.6 (Sunfreeware package) and GNU ld 2.11.2. ... threads.c:36: warning: missing braces around initializer ... fake-addrinfo.c: At top level: fake-addrinfo.c:1331: error: variable `krb5int_in6addr_any' has initializer but incomplete type

Re: Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-26 Thread Ken Raeburn
On Oct 26, 2006, at 17:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, everyone, I'm trying to compile MIT's Kerberos V (krb5-1.5.1) on SPARC Solaris 2.6, and it keeps blowing up. At the moment, I'm using the GNU tools to do the build, since Sun's compiler won't take the arguments that configure wants to

Re: Compile problems on Solaris 2.6

2006-10-26 Thread Tom Maddox
On 10/26/06, Ken Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note that MIT isn't testing with a Solaris version nearly that old. I think Solaris 9 is the oldest we're testing on, or even have available Well, upgrading isn't completely out of the question, but it'll be more painful for sure. I'll