Dears, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our client National Bank of Poland in Europe, would like to use Kerberos
5 ver 1.3.
Which type of agreement / license they needed to use this software in
Central Europe?
Regards,
Jacek
Kerberos mailing list
an easier solution would be to setup a windows realm for Win2k KDC and a cross re
alm trust with a linux box in a different realm.
We were doing this (with Solaris, not Linux), but when the bug and fix
for the cross-realm security hole came out a few months ago, that caused
it all to break (we
EXACTLY
plus the krb4 versions had so many bad security flaws, we had no choice. when the bad
krb4 bug came out last year, we removed any dependencies or backwards compatible 4
code and just use 5.
mel
-Original Message-
From: Ken Hornstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
On Tuesday, Jul 22, 2003, at 07:52 US/Pacific, Ken Hornstein wrote:
an easier solution would be to setup a windows realm for Win2k KDC
and a cross re
alm trust with a linux box in a different realm.
We were doing this (with Solaris, not Linux), but when the bug and fix
for the cross-realm
We're not running OpenAFS. Still Transarc AFS.
Heh, sucks to be you :-)
I hadn't heard that there's a pure krb5 solution for AFS, though ...
even with OpenAFS.
Well, I wouldn't call it pure. It's restricted to single-DES, and it's
only sorta V5, but it's enough to fix the V4 cross-realm
jacekn == Jacek Nowicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jacekn Our client National Bank of Poland in Europe, would like to
jacekn use Kerberos 5 ver 1.3. Which type of agreement / license
jacekn they needed to use this software in Central Europe?
The README file in the release dictates the copyright
Esteemed Kerberos Peers,
I am trying to set up AFS and authenticate with my Kerberos 5 KDC
(AFS on RedHat, KDC on debian linux)
My question today is:
Can I leave my Kerberos 5 KDC in pure Kerb 5 mode or
do I have to run some kind of Kerb 5-to-4 daemon to
issue kerb 4 tickets to the AFS server
Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
Are you sure Heimdal is thread-safe? Like a month ago I checked with
them and theirs is not thread-safe either.
Kent
-Original Message-
From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 10:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MIT Kerberos: is it Thread-Safe?
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:03:09AM -0700, MattW wibbled:
Esteemed Kerberos Peers,
I am trying to set up AFS and authenticate with my Kerberos 5 KDC
(AFS on RedHat, KDC on debian linux)
My question today is:
Can I leave my Kerberos 5 KDC in pure Kerb 5 mode or
do I have to run some kind
Scott,
Sounds like we're both trying to do the same thing... Im at the
University of Washington in Seattle in a small group - we have
NT 4 now and are going to upgrade to windows 2000 w/active
directory soon and want to use a Linux-MIT-Kerberos server
as our master authentication. So all
MattW == MattW [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MattW Esteemed Kerberos Peers,
MattW I am trying to set up AFS and authenticate with my Kerberos
MattW 5 KDC (AFS on RedHat, KDC on debian linux)
MattW My question today is:
MattW Can I leave my Kerberos 5 KDC in pure Kerb 5 mode
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure Heimdal is thread-safe? Like a month ago I checked with
them and theirs is not thread-safe either.
- Rumor has it that while heimdal is not guaranteed to be
thread-safe, in practice it works well enough. (i.e. there
are a lot of people
Russ == Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MattW == MattW [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MattW Can I leave my Kerberos 5 KDC in pure Kerb 5 mode or do I
MattW have to run some kind of Kerb 5-to-4 daemon to issue kerb 4
MattW tickets
Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
16 matches
Mail list logo
