On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:02:02PM -0400, Nicolas Williams wrote:
Why not change the default ccach version then? I remember hearing that
there was a problem with that, but I can't remember what that was...
It was disabled because if you turn it on, anything built with older
versions of
Nicolas == Nicolas Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nicolas What's involved in switching to ccache v4, besides
Nicolas changing krb5.conf?
Nothing.
Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman
:
Nicolas == Nicolas Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nicolas What's involved in switching to ccache v4, besides
Nicolas changing krb5.conf?
Nothing.
--
-DISCLAIMER: an automatically appended disclaimer may follow. By posting-
-to a public e-mail mailing list I hereby grant
Nicolas == Nicolas Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nicolas Why not change the default ccach version then? I remember
Nicolas hearing that there was a problem with that, but I can't
Nicolas remember what that was...
Please open a bug. I'll deal.
Why not change the default ccach version then? I remember hearing that
there was a problem with that, but I can't remember what that was...
It breaks under OS X (you get Invalid credential cache version when you
try to kinit). I'm not sure why; I just noticed it and I haven't had
time to
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:20 PM
To: Williams, Nicolas
Cc: Sam Hartman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Switching to ccache v4?
Why not change the default ccach version then? I remember
hearing that
there was a problem with that, but I can't remember what that was...
It breaks
Nicolas == Nicolas Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nicolas The daemon can be changed at any time to implement
Nicolas interesting features like these; the shared memory
Nicolas approach would require changes to libkrb5 to implement
Nicolas such features.
I thought one of
I see.
--
-Original Message-
From: Sam Hartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Williams, Nicolas
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Switching to ccache v4?
...
I thought one of the central points of CCAPI was that it defined a DLL
interface
