Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-06-19 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
nor release. > > Regards, > Kai > > -Original Message- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 4:45 PM > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility > > Yes, it works perfectly, than

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-06-19 Thread Zheng, Kai
@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility Yes, it works perfectly, thanks Jiajia for the fix! I'll resolve the JIRA. Colm. On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Li, Jiajia wrote: > Hi Colm, > Thanks for providing the way to reproduce the error, and I have the fix in > trunk

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-06-19 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
l Message- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 6:19 PM > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility > > OK I have created a JIRA and attached a patch that you have to apply to the > Apache WSS4J project

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-06-18 Thread Li, Jiajia
error message with GSS + default transport. Thanks Jiajia -Original Message- From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 6:19 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility OK I have created a JIRA and attached a patch

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-08 Thread Marc de Lignie
cbc-md4-deprecated not supported 2017-05-04T20:44:06 set-error: -1765328234: Encryption type des-cbc-crc-deprecated not supported First kerberos.authGSSClientStep successful Thanks Jiajia -Original Message- From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:kai.zh...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 7:2

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-08 Thread Christopher Lamb
"kerby@directory.apache.org" Date: 08/05/2017 12:58 Subject:RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Marc, Thanks for your patience. It looks to me there is some issue in Kerby with Heimdal compatibility. Note we haven't supported Heimdal yet. So far, Kerby is tested and

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-08 Thread Zheng, Kai
13 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Jiajia and Kai, Puzzled by the fact that the Mit Kerberos over python service ticket request works on Jiajia's system but not on mine. I attempted to request the service ticket with Mit Kerberos's kinit tool

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-08 Thread Zheng, Kai
Thanks Colm for the confirm! Regards, Kai From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 6:36 PM To: Zheng, Kai Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Kai, No I think it wasn't caused by recent changes. It's fine

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-08 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
ailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 6:19 PM > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility > > OK I have created a JIRA and attached a patch that you have to apply to the > Apache WSS4J project to reproduce the error. If you uncommen

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-08 Thread Zheng, Kai
e.org] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 6:19 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility OK I have created a JIRA and attached a patch that you have to apply to the Apache WSS4J project to reproduce the error. If you uncomment the line that uses Netty then the tests all work

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-08 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
s? Any difference between the failed GSS tests and the Kerby > GSS tests? > > Regards, > Kai > > -Original Message- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 5:42 PM > To: Zheng, Kai > Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org >

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-08 Thread Zheng, Kai
5:42 PM To: Zheng, Kai Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Kai, Your changes fixed the error message I was seeing. However, I now see another problem when I run a few GSS client tests in a row: >>> EType: sun.secu

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-08 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
;> > >>> Sent from iPhone > >>> > >>>> 在 2017年5月6日,上午12:02,Colm O hEigeartaigh 写道: > >>>> > >>>> That's probably it. Why does the default transport not support UDP in > >>> Kerby? > >>>> > &

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-07 Thread Marc de Lignie
kai.zh...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 7:29 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Marc, In case you're not aware of this, please check out the latest fix made by Jiajia. We thought your case may be different, but would be good to have a

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-06 Thread Marc de Lignie
al Message- From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:kai.zh...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 7:29 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Marc, In case you're not aware of this, please check out the latest fix made by Jiajia. We thought your case may be differen

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Li, Jiajia
at's probably it. Why does the default transport not support UDP >>>> in >>> Kerby? >>>> >>>> Colm. >>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Li, Jiajia wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Are you sure add kdc_al

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Zheng, Kai
oes the default transport not support UDP in >>> Kerby? >>>> >>>> Colm. >>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Li, Jiajia wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Are you sure add kdc_allow_udp = false in kdc.conf? >>>>&

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Li, Jiajia
-Original Message- From: Marc de Lignie [mailto:m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2017 4:13 AM To: Li, Jiajia Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Jiajia, Thanks for the netty config option. This indeed helped to get rid of the udp errors, but

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Zheng, Kai
> >>> Colm. >>> >>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Li, Jiajia wrote: >>>> >>>> Are you sure add kdc_allow_udp = false in kdc.conf? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Jiajia >>>> >>>> -

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
y kint and MIT kinit, and only > >>> listen the tcp port(disable udp), both got ticket successfully. But I > >>> don't get the error message. Both krb.conf and kdc.conf should set udp > >>> to be false, udp is enabled in default. > >>> > &g

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Zheng, Kai
taigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] >> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 11:41 PM >> To: Li, Jiajia >> Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org; Zheng, Kai ; mailto: >> m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl >> Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility >> >> Sorry, it was my error, UDP was

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 11:41 PM > To: Li, Jiajia > Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org; Zheng, Kai ; mailto: > m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl > Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility > > Sorry, it was my error, UDP was actually enabled there. But why a

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Li, Jiajia
] > Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 11:34 PM > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > Cc: Zheng, Kai ; mailto:m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl < > m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl> > Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility > > Hi Jiajia, > > If UDP is disabled and we don't use Netty, I can g

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Friday, May 5, 2017 11:34 PM > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > Cc: Zheng, Kai ; mailto:m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl < > m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl> > Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility > > Hi Jiajia, > > If UDP is disabled and we don't use Netty, I can get a token succes

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Li, Jiajia
ssage- From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 11:34 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Cc: Zheng, Kai ; mailto:m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Jiajia, If UDP is disabled and we don't use Netty, I can get a token su

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Zheng, Kai
while processing request:Additional pre-authentication >> required >> [nioEventLoopGroup-5-1] INFO >> org.apache.kerby.kerberos.kerb.server.request.AsRequest >> - AS_REQ ISSUE: authtime 1493991123859,test-service/localh...@test.com >> for krbtgt/test@test.c

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Cc: Zheng, Kai ; mailto:m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl < > m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl> > Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility > > Hi Jiajia, > > What are the issues if UDP is disabled and we don't use Netty? I tried > doing this with my own test-cases and it didn't work

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Li, Jiajia
7 10:09 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Cc: Zheng, Kai ; mailto:m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Jiajia, What are the issues if UDP is disabled and we don't use Netty? I tried doing this with my own test-cases and it didn't work, so it would be good

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
rbtgt/test@test.com > [nioEventLoopGroup-5-1] INFO > org.apache.kerby.kerberos.kerb.server.request.TgsRequest > - TGS_REQ ISSUE: authtime 1493991142850,drankye for test-service/ > localh...@test.com > > Thanks > Jiajia > > -Original Message- > From: Zheng, Kai &

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Li, Jiajia
..@test.com Thanks Jiajia -Original Message- From: Zheng, Kai Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 7:46 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org; Li, Jiajia Subject: RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Marc, Looks like this is quite environment related, could you fire an issue for this? I would sugge

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Zheng, Kai
, Jiajia Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Jiajia, Great to read that you made progress on this issue and to see a working config at your side. Below, I list my progress below (with trunk merged into my MitIssue branch), but I am afraid we are not done yet

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-05 Thread Marc de Lignie
ncryption type des-cbc-md4-deprecated not supported 2017-05-04T20:44:06 set-error: -1765328234: Encryption type des-cbc-crc-deprecated not supported First kerberos.authGSSClientStep successful Thanks Jiajia -Original Message- From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:kai.zh...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-04 Thread Li, Jiajia
l.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 7:29 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Marc, In case you're not aware of this, please check out the latest fix made by Jiajia. We thought your case may be different, but would be good to have a check before we can

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-03 Thread Zheng, Kai
ssage- From: Marc de Lignie [mailto:m.c.delig...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 7:45 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Kai, The terminal output below is for the latest MIT Kerberos 1.15.1 (locally built on Ubuntu Xenial). Before that, I

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-04-30 Thread Marc de Lignie
Hi Kai, The terminal output below is for the latest MIT Kerberos 1.15.1 (locally built on Ubuntu Xenial). Before that, I also tested with the default Xenial MIT Kerberos packages (1.13.2), with the same result. I did not try earlier MIT Kerberos versions. Marc Op 29-04-17 om 21:42 schreef M

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-04-29 Thread Zheng, Kai
ry.apache.org Subject: RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi Kai, Thanks for the response. I prepared a minimal config that reproduces my problem. You can fetch the branch/commit from: https://github.com/vtslab/directory-kerby/commits/MitIssue This is relative to RC2, but I also tried this on tr

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-04-29 Thread Marc de Lignie
Hi Kai, Thanks for the response. I prepared a minimal config that reproduces my problem. You can fetch the branch/commit from: https://github.com/vtslab/directory-kerby/commits/MitIssue This is relative to RC2, but I also tried this on trunk for my actual project. This config produces the

RE: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-04-26 Thread Zheng, Kai
, 2017 2:42 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: MIT Kerberos compatibility Hi all, Did anyone have any luck with using a MIT Kerberos client with Apache Kerby? Any documentation or directions? What I am trying to achieve is: - generate a TGT and store in a credential cache with the Kerby

MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-04-26 Thread Marc de Lignie
Hi all, Did anyone have any luck with using a MIT Kerberos client with Apache Kerby? Any documentation or directions? What I am trying to achieve is: - generate a TGT and store in a credential cache with the Kerby client. No problems here - Use MIT Kerberos (with PyKerberos) to create a