RE: Happy New Year !

Happy new year! Thanks Jiajia -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Lécharny [mailto:elecha...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 01, 2016 4:44 PM To: Apache Directory Developers List; kerby@directory.apache.org; Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Happy New Year ! 2016 is still in

Re: AP-REP message

Le 03/01/16 21:50, Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit : > Hi, > > another class, another question ;-) > > (Note that this class is currently not used in Kerby (it will be at some > point, as this message is sent back to the client as a response to a > KRB-AP-REQ message when the mutual authent AP-Options

Re: AdToken usage ?

Le 04/01/16 06:18, Zheng, Kai a écrit : > Not yet. There were two PDFs in the docs folder that document about it. > They're still drafts but we're still pushing on that. Ah, good to know !!! I'll add a reference to this draft in the code. Thanks Kai !

RE: Fail to run ' mvn apache-rat:check'

Thanks Kai, I will check my env. -Original Message- From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:kai.zh...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:53 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: RE: Fail to run ' mvn apache-rat:check' "mvn rat:check" found something in my side. -Original

RE: ApOption vs ApOptions

Thanks for the review comments. >> then where are the last 2 value coming from ? I don't track relevant RFCs but just find below from MIT krb5 codes. Please note if trust RFCs, then we may also need to check other RFCs (not just 4210). #define AP_OPTS_RESERVED 0x8000 #define

RE: AP-REP message

I know and agree with the point you made here. What I would say is that, our Kerberos implementation codes are still lacking many things and to be evolved fast. We may see many classes, variables, methods and codes are not referenced in the existing codes, it's normal because we have so much to

Re: AP-REP message

Le 04/01/16 06:12, Zheng, Kai a écrit : > It's good to look at the life cycle of these decrypted objects but I don't > think it will help a lot if we would do otherwise. Generally decrypting the > part and using the decrypted result are not the same place. Here is where the encrpted data is

Fail to run ' mvn apache-rat:check'

Hi all, I try to run 'mvn apache-rat:check', but with issue: [INFO] [ERROR] No plugin found for prefix 'apache-rat' in the current project and in the plugin groups [org.apache.maven.plugins, org.codehaus.mojo] available

RE: Fail to run ' mvn apache-rat:check'

"mvn rat:check" found something in my side. -Original Message- From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:45 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Fail to run ' mvn apache-rat:check' Hi all, I try to run 'mvn apache-rat:check', but with issue:

FW: [directory-kerby] Git Push Summary

Note this branch 'backup-before-1.0.0-rc2' is marked and we would pick up some codes from it to resume some feature development after RC2 is done. Regards, Kai -Original Message- From: dran...@apache.org [mailto:dran...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2016 8:27 PM To: