RE: Questions about the release

2017-05-07 Thread Li, Jiajia
Hi Emmanuel, Thanks very much for listing out the dependencies of each modules, I will add the N&L based on your work. Thanks Jiajia -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Lécharny [mailto:elecha...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 12:18 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Questi

Questions about the release

2017-05-07 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Hi guys, I have checked all the modules, and their dependencies. Here is the result : kerby-all -> test[junit, assertj-core] : OK, no N&L, test | +-- kerby-common -> [commons.io] : OK, no N&L, Apache +-- kerby-pkix -> [slf4j-api], test[slf4j-simple, mockito-core] : Need to add the slf4j N&

RE: [VOTE] - Release Apache Kerby 1.0.0

2017-05-07 Thread Zheng, Kai
Hi Jiajia, Thanks for your hard work and pushing on the release. >> the kerby-dist module will copy the dependencies to the >> kerby-dist/kdc-dist/target/lib and kerby-dist/tool-dist/target/lib. Could you sort out what kinds of 3rd party dependencies are involved here? Particularly in the view

RE: [VOTE] - Release Apache Kerby 1.0.0

2017-05-07 Thread Li, Jiajia
>>>At this point, I don't know what we package : there is a kerby-dist >>>sub-project, which supposely generates the packages, but it's hard to >>>tell what is inside, without looking to the maven pom files and assembly >>>files. I'd like that to be explicit somewhere for people to check >>>eas

Re: [CANCELLED] Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache Kerby 1.0.0

2017-05-07 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 07/05/2017 à 10:31, Colm O hEigeartaigh a écrit : > I'm cancelling this vote until we have addressed Emmanuel's concerns. > Emmanuel, can you review the changes Jiajia made? Can you simply suspend the vote ? I'd like to be sure I'm not 100% wrong with the N&L stuff. We need to have a convo a

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache Kerby 1.0.0

2017-05-07 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 07/05/2017 à 13:08, Stefan Seelmann a écrit : > On 05/06/2017 09:53 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> but I can't cas a +1 : the N&L are lacking some required external >> licenses (MIT for mockito, qos.ch for slf4j, BSD for harmcrest, ASM is >> BSD, and bytebuddy depends on it, Junit is ECL, Net

Re: MIT Kerberos compatibility

2017-05-07 Thread Marc de Lignie
Hi Jiajia and Kai, Puzzled by the fact that the Mit Kerberos over python service ticket request works on Jiajia's system but not on mine. I attempted to request the service ticket with Mit Kerberos's kinit tool and it worked. This means that my issue probably lies in the kerberos python

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache Kerby 1.0.0

2017-05-07 Thread Stefan Seelmann
On 05/06/2017 09:53 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > but I can't cas a +1 : the N&L are lacking some required external > licenses (MIT for mockito, qos.ch for slf4j, BSD for harmcrest, ASM is > BSD, and bytebuddy depends on it, Junit is ECL, Netty has a NOTICE file > just must be included - see > htt

[CANCELLED] Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache Kerby 1.0.0

2017-05-07 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
I'm cancelling this vote until we have addressed Emmanuel's concerns. Emmanuel, can you review the changes Jiajia made? Colm. On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Li, Jiajia wrote: > Thanks Emmanuel for pointing out this license issue. I've added the > licenses in NOTICE、LICENSE and licenses folder,