Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby

2017-12-18 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
gt; Regards, > Kai > > -- > 发件人:Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> > 发送时间:2017年12月15日(星期五) 10:38 > 收件人:Apache Directory Developers List <d...@directory.apache.org>; > cohei...@apache.org <cohei...@apache.org> > 抄 送:kerby@directory.apache.org <kerby@dire

RE: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby

2017-12-14 Thread Li, Jiajia
ist <d...@directory.apache.org>; kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby Hi Jiajia, Perhaps you could get one of the Alibaba contributors to mail "secret...@apache.org<mailto:secret...@apache.org>" and ask if there is a CCLA on record? Colm.

RE: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby

2017-12-04 Thread Li, Jiajia
r 5, 2017 1:55 AM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Cc: Apache Directory Developers List <d...@directory.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby Hi Jiajia, Answers inline. On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> wrote: > > > Now I u

RE: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby

2017-12-04 Thread Li, Jiajia
@directory.apache.org Cc: Apache Directory Developers List <d...@directory.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby Do we have both CCLAs filed for Intel and Alibaba? Colm. On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com<mailto:jiajia...@intel.com>> wr

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby

2017-12-04 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
to Kerby, once the legal stuff is sorted out. Colm. > > Thanks > Jiajia > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 10:58 PM > To: Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> > Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org; Apache Direc

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby

2017-11-29 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 9:12 PM > To: Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> > Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org; Apache Directory Developers List < > d...@directory.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby > > Thanks Jiajia, that was v

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby

2017-11-28 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
and sync up their user accounts to Kerberos back and forth. > 2. Multiple users could run the job at the same time and in the same > machine, through collecting user info from environment variables in step4. > > > Thanks, > Jiajia > > -Original Message- > From: Colm

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby

2017-11-27 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi Jiajia, It sounds like a really interesting project. Have you got any feedback from the Hadoop project about it? I'm finding it hard to understand exactly how it works though based on the README. Could you describe how it works from a really basic point of view for say a simple Hadoop client?

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby

2017-11-27 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
I think "HAS" is a good > choice if we want to create a standalone module for it. Please correct me > if I am wrong. > > Thanks, > Jiajia > > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Seelmann [mailto:m...@stefan-seelmann.de] > Sent: Sunday, November 26, 201

RE: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby

2017-11-26 Thread Li, Jiajia
em, so I think "HAS" is a good choice if we want to create a standalone module for it. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks, Jiajia -Original Message- From: Stefan Seelmann [mailto:m...@stefan-seelmann.de] Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2017 12:22 AM To: Apache Directory Developers

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HAS to Apache Kerby

2017-11-25 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Hi Jiajia, Le 24/11/2017 à 04:30, Li, Jiajia a écrit : > Hi all, > > I would like to post a proposal about merging a new project HAS (Hadoop > Authentication Service) to Apache Kerby. HAS is led by Intel and Alibaba, it > is a solution to support the authentication of open source big data