Re: Kerby 1.0 GA
OK will do. Colm. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > Thanks for the catch, Colm. It looks like a mess and we should bring those > backends back. > > Regards, > Kai > > -Original Message- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 7:45 PM > To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org; Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > Hi Kai, > > I'll call a vote today if I get some feedback on the email I sent about > the backends - Jiajia committed a merge which commented out most of the > backends. > > Colm. > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > > > Sounds great. Thanks Colm! Do we need to vote before we have release > > artifacts or after that? Hope we can make it soon and won't block the > > Hadoop 3.0 Alpha3 releasing. > > > > Regards, > > Kai > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > > Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 4:38 PM > > To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > > Cc: Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com>; kerby@directory.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > > > If it's all the same, I'd prefer to use "1.0.0" as this is the more > > common convention at Apache. Yes, no problem at all with minor > > releases. We could release 1.0.1 or 1.1.0 etc. > > > > Colm. > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Colm for the taking! > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought both work for me meaning the same thing. If changing the > > > POMs to point to 1.0.0-GA could be easier, maybe we could use it? > > > > > > > > > > > > By the way, after this major release, we could release often, given > > > important bug fixes or features. I noticed left issues are all > > > targeted to 2.0.0, we could have 1.1.0 version for some of the left > > issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Kai > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > > > *Sent:* Thursday, May 04, 2017 10:22 PM > > > *To:* Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> > > > *Cc:* kerby@directory.apache.org; Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts on what the release version should be? We're using > > > 1.0.0-GA in JIRA, but I'm thinking just "1.0.0" for the poms. > > > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > <cohei...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Yes, I will take care of the release today. > > > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Colm, > > > > > > I've removed the open JIRAs to a future release. > > > Our network is very bad for dong the release process, so could take > > > the release work? > > > 1.0.0 GA will used in the next Hadoop release version > > > 3.0.0-alpha3(May 15), so we should finish the release before it. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Jiajia > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 7:33 PM > > > To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > > > Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > > > > > OK, I've merged a bunch of fixes and I'm now done for the 1.0.0-GA > > release. > > > I see there are still a few open JIRAs. When do you anticipate > > > calling the vote? > > > > > > Colm. > > > > > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > <cohei...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > There are a lot of open issues (including one "in progress") for > > > > the 1.0.0-GA release in JIRA: > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB/fixforversion/1233277 > > > > 5 > > > > > > > > It would be a good idea to
RE: Kerby 1.0 GA
Thanks for the catch, Colm. It looks like a mess and we should bring those backends back. Regards, Kai -Original Message- From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 7:45 PM To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org; Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA Hi Kai, I'll call a vote today if I get some feedback on the email I sent about the backends - Jiajia committed a merge which commented out most of the backends. Colm. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > Sounds great. Thanks Colm! Do we need to vote before we have release > artifacts or after that? Hope we can make it soon and won't block the > Hadoop 3.0 Alpha3 releasing. > > Regards, > Kai > > -Original Message- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 4:38 PM > To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > Cc: Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com>; kerby@directory.apache.org > Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > If it's all the same, I'd prefer to use "1.0.0" as this is the more > common convention at Apache. Yes, no problem at all with minor > releases. We could release 1.0.1 or 1.1.0 etc. > > Colm. > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Colm for the taking! > > > > > > > > I thought both work for me meaning the same thing. If changing the > > POMs to point to 1.0.0-GA could be easier, maybe we could use it? > > > > > > > > By the way, after this major release, we could release often, given > > important bug fixes or features. I noticed left issues are all > > targeted to 2.0.0, we could have 1.1.0 version for some of the left > issues. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Kai > > > > > > > > *From:* Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > > *Sent:* Thursday, May 04, 2017 10:22 PM > > *To:* Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> > > *Cc:* kerby@directory.apache.org; Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > > > > *Subject:* Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > > > > > > > Any thoughts on what the release version should be? We're using > > 1.0.0-GA in JIRA, but I'm thinking just "1.0.0" for the poms. > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > > <cohei...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > Yes, I will take care of the release today. > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Colm, > > > > I've removed the open JIRAs to a future release. > > Our network is very bad for dong the release process, so could take > > the release work? > > 1.0.0 GA will used in the next Hadoop release version > > 3.0.0-alpha3(May 15), so we should finish the release before it. > > > > Thanks > > Jiajia > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > > Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 7:33 PM > > To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > > Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > > > OK, I've merged a bunch of fixes and I'm now done for the 1.0.0-GA > release. > > I see there are still a few open JIRAs. When do you anticipate > > calling the vote? > > > > Colm. > > > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > > <cohei...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > There are a lot of open issues (including one "in progress") for > > > the 1.0.0-GA release in JIRA: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB/fixforversion/1233277 > > > 5 > > > > > > It would be a good idea to go through the issues and decide which > > > will be fixed for the GA release, and which should be moved to a > > > future > > release. > > > > > > Colm. > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> This makes sense. The GA should clean such kinds of codes. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Kai > > >> > > >> -Original Message- > > >> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 6:38 PM > > >> To: kerby@directory.apache
Re: Kerby 1.0 GA
Hi Kai, I'll call a vote today if I get some feedback on the email I sent about the backends - Jiajia committed a merge which commented out most of the backends. Colm. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > Sounds great. Thanks Colm! Do we need to vote before we have release > artifacts or after that? Hope we can make it soon and won't block the > Hadoop 3.0 Alpha3 releasing. > > Regards, > Kai > > -Original Message- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 4:38 PM > To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > Cc: Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com>; kerby@directory.apache.org > Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > If it's all the same, I'd prefer to use "1.0.0" as this is the more common > convention at Apache. Yes, no problem at all with minor releases. We could > release 1.0.1 or 1.1.0 etc. > > Colm. > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Colm for the taking! > > > > > > > > I thought both work for me meaning the same thing. If changing the > > POMs to point to 1.0.0-GA could be easier, maybe we could use it? > > > > > > > > By the way, after this major release, we could release often, given > > important bug fixes or features. I noticed left issues are all > > targeted to 2.0.0, we could have 1.1.0 version for some of the left > issues. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Kai > > > > > > > > *From:* Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > > *Sent:* Thursday, May 04, 2017 10:22 PM > > *To:* Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> > > *Cc:* kerby@directory.apache.org; Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > > > > *Subject:* Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > > > > > > > Any thoughts on what the release version should be? We're using > > 1.0.0-GA in JIRA, but I'm thinking just "1.0.0" for the poms. > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > > <cohei...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > Yes, I will take care of the release today. > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Colm, > > > > I've removed the open JIRAs to a future release. > > Our network is very bad for dong the release process, so could take > > the release work? > > 1.0.0 GA will used in the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha3(May > > 15), so we should finish the release before it. > > > > Thanks > > Jiajia > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > > Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 7:33 PM > > To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > > Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > > > OK, I've merged a bunch of fixes and I'm now done for the 1.0.0-GA > release. > > I see there are still a few open JIRAs. When do you anticipate calling > > the vote? > > > > Colm. > > > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > > <cohei...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > There are a lot of open issues (including one "in progress") for the > > > 1.0.0-GA release in JIRA: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB/fixforversion/12332775 > > > > > > It would be a good idea to go through the issues and decide which > > > will be fixed for the GA release, and which should be moved to a > > > future > > release. > > > > > > Colm. > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> This makes sense. The GA should clean such kinds of codes. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Kai > > >> > > >> -Original Message- > > >> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 6:38 PM > > >> To: kerby@directory.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > >> > > >> One improvement I'd like to see before the 1.0 GA release is to > > >> improve the exception handling. There are many examples of catch > > >> statements that just have a printStackTrace() leading to NPEs down > > >> the line. Apart from that, +1 from me on the release: > > >> &
RE: Kerby 1.0 GA
Sounds great. Thanks Colm! Do we need to vote before we have release artifacts or after that? Hope we can make it soon and won't block the Hadoop 3.0 Alpha3 releasing. Regards, Kai -Original Message- From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 4:38 PM To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> Cc: Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com>; kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA If it's all the same, I'd prefer to use "1.0.0" as this is the more common convention at Apache. Yes, no problem at all with minor releases. We could release 1.0.1 or 1.1.0 etc. Colm. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > Thanks Colm for the taking! > > > > I thought both work for me meaning the same thing. If changing the > POMs to point to 1.0.0-GA could be easier, maybe we could use it? > > > > By the way, after this major release, we could release often, given > important bug fixes or features. I noticed left issues are all > targeted to 2.0.0, we could have 1.1.0 version for some of the left issues. > > > > Regards, > > Kai > > > > *From:* Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 04, 2017 10:22 PM > *To:* Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> > *Cc:* kerby@directory.apache.org; Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > > *Subject:* Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > > > Any thoughts on what the release version should be? We're using > 1.0.0-GA in JIRA, but I'm thinking just "1.0.0" for the poms. > > Colm. > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > <cohei...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Yes, I will take care of the release today. > > Colm. > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Colm, > > I've removed the open JIRAs to a future release. > Our network is very bad for dong the release process, so could take > the release work? > 1.0.0 GA will used in the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha3(May > 15), so we should finish the release before it. > > Thanks > Jiajia > > -Original Message- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 7:33 PM > To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org > Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > OK, I've merged a bunch of fixes and I'm now done for the 1.0.0-GA release. > I see there are still a few open JIRAs. When do you anticipate calling > the vote? > > Colm. > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > <cohei...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > There are a lot of open issues (including one "in progress") for the > > 1.0.0-GA release in JIRA: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB/fixforversion/12332775 > > > > It would be a good idea to go through the issues and decide which > > will be fixed for the GA release, and which should be moved to a > > future > release. > > > > Colm. > > > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > > > >> This makes sense. The GA should clean such kinds of codes. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Kai > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 6:38 PM > >> To: kerby@directory.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > >> > >> One improvement I'd like to see before the 1.0 GA release is to > >> improve the exception handling. There are many examples of catch > >> statements that just have a printStackTrace() leading to NPEs down > >> the line. Apart from that, +1 from me on the release: > >> > >> find . -name "*.java" -path "*/main/*" | xargs grep > >> "printStackTrace()" | wc -l > >> 30 > >> > >> Colm. > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > Sounds cool! Thanks Jiajia for taking this step forward. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Kai > >> > > >> > -Original Message- > >> > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] > >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:54 AM > >> > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > >> > Subject: RE: Kerby 1.0 GA > >> > > >> > Sorry for wrong typo. > >> > > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >>
Re: Kerby 1.0 GA
Any thoughts on what the release version should be? We're using 1.0.0-GA in JIRA, but I'm thinking just "1.0.0" for the poms. Colm. On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> wrote: > Yes, I will take care of the release today. > > Colm. > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> wrote: > >> Hi Colm, >> >> I've removed the open JIRAs to a future release. >> Our network is very bad for dong the release process, so could take the >> release work? >> 1.0.0 GA will used in the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha3(May >> 15), so we should finish the release before it. >> >> Thanks >> Jiajia >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] >> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 7:33 PM >> To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> >> Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA >> >> OK, I've merged a bunch of fixes and I'm now done for the 1.0.0-GA >> release. >> I see there are still a few open JIRAs. When do you anticipate calling >> the vote? >> >> Colm. >> >> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > There are a lot of open issues (including one "in progress") for the >> > 1.0.0-GA release in JIRA: >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB/fixforversion/12332775 >> > >> > It would be a good idea to go through the issues and decide which will >> > be fixed for the GA release, and which should be moved to a future >> release. >> > >> > Colm. >> > >> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> This makes sense. The GA should clean such kinds of codes. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Kai >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] >> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 6:38 PM >> >> To: kerby@directory.apache.org >> >> Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA >> >> >> >> One improvement I'd like to see before the 1.0 GA release is to >> >> improve the exception handling. There are many examples of catch >> >> statements that just have a printStackTrace() leading to NPEs down >> >> the line. Apart from that, +1 from me on the release: >> >> >> >> find . -name "*.java" -path "*/main/*" | xargs grep >> >> "printStackTrace()" | wc -l >> >> 30 >> >> >> >> Colm. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Sounds cool! Thanks Jiajia for taking this step forward. >> >> > >> >> > Regards, >> >> > Kai >> >> > >> >> > -Original Message- >> >> > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:54 AM >> >> > To: kerby@directory.apache.org >> >> > Subject: RE: Kerby 1.0 GA >> >> > >> >> > Sorry for wrong typo. >> >> > >> >> > Hi all, >> >> > >> >> > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. >> >> > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have >> >> > added lots of new features and bug fixes. >> >> > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and >> >> > 1.0.0 GA will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha3. >> >> > >> >> > Regards, >> >> > Jiajia >> >> > >> >> > -Original Message- >> >> > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:49 AM >> >> > To: kerby@directory.apache.org >> >> > Subject: Kerby 1.0 GA >> >> > >> >> > Hi all, >> >> > >> >> > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. >> >> > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have >> >> > added lots of new features and bug fixes. >> >> > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and >> >> > 1.0.0 GA will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha1. >> >> > >> >> > Regards, >> >> > Jiajia >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Colm O hEigeartaigh >> >> >> >> Talend Community Coder >> >> http://coders.talend.com >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Colm O hEigeartaigh >> > >> > Talend Community Coder >> > http://coders.talend.com >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Colm O hEigeartaigh >> >> Talend Community Coder >> http://coders.talend.com >> > > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
Re: Kerby 1.0 GA
Yes, I will take care of the release today. Colm. On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Li, Jiajia <jiajia...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Colm, > > I've removed the open JIRAs to a future release. > Our network is very bad for dong the release process, so could take the > release work? > 1.0.0 GA will used in the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha3(May > 15), so we should finish the release before it. > > Thanks > Jiajia > > -Original Message- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 7:33 PM > To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org > Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > > OK, I've merged a bunch of fixes and I'm now done for the 1.0.0-GA release. > I see there are still a few open JIRAs. When do you anticipate calling the > vote? > > Colm. > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > There are a lot of open issues (including one "in progress") for the > > 1.0.0-GA release in JIRA: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB/fixforversion/12332775 > > > > It would be a good idea to go through the issues and decide which will > > be fixed for the GA release, and which should be moved to a future > release. > > > > Colm. > > > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > > > >> This makes sense. The GA should clean such kinds of codes. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Kai > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 6:38 PM > >> To: kerby@directory.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA > >> > >> One improvement I'd like to see before the 1.0 GA release is to > >> improve the exception handling. There are many examples of catch > >> statements that just have a printStackTrace() leading to NPEs down > >> the line. Apart from that, +1 from me on the release: > >> > >> find . -name "*.java" -path "*/main/*" | xargs grep > >> "printStackTrace()" | wc -l > >> 30 > >> > >> Colm. > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > Sounds cool! Thanks Jiajia for taking this step forward. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Kai > >> > > >> > -Original Message- > >> > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] > >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:54 AM > >> > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > >> > Subject: RE: Kerby 1.0 GA > >> > > >> > Sorry for wrong typo. > >> > > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. > >> > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have > >> > added lots of new features and bug fixes. > >> > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and > >> > 1.0.0 GA will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha3. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Jiajia > >> > > >> > -Original Message- > >> > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] > >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:49 AM > >> > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > >> > Subject: Kerby 1.0 GA > >> > > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. > >> > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have > >> > added lots of new features and bug fixes. > >> > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and > >> > 1.0.0 GA will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha1. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Jiajia > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Colm O hEigeartaigh > >> > >> Talend Community Coder > >> http://coders.talend.com > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > > Talend Community Coder > > http://coders.talend.com > > > > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
RE: Kerby 1.0 GA
Hi Colm, I've removed the open JIRAs to a future release. Our network is very bad for dong the release process, so could take the release work? 1.0.0 GA will used in the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha3(May 15), so we should finish the release before it. Thanks Jiajia -Original Message- From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 7:33 PM To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> Cc: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA OK, I've merged a bunch of fixes and I'm now done for the 1.0.0-GA release. I see there are still a few open JIRAs. When do you anticipate calling the vote? Colm. On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> wrote: > There are a lot of open issues (including one "in progress") for the > 1.0.0-GA release in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB/fixforversion/12332775 > > It would be a good idea to go through the issues and decide which will > be fixed for the GA release, and which should be moved to a future release. > > Colm. > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > >> This makes sense. The GA should clean such kinds of codes. >> >> Regards, >> Kai >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 6:38 PM >> To: kerby@directory.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA >> >> One improvement I'd like to see before the 1.0 GA release is to >> improve the exception handling. There are many examples of catch >> statements that just have a printStackTrace() leading to NPEs down >> the line. Apart from that, +1 from me on the release: >> >> find . -name "*.java" -path "*/main/*" | xargs grep >> "printStackTrace()" | wc -l >> 30 >> >> Colm. >> >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: >> >> > Sounds cool! Thanks Jiajia for taking this step forward. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Kai >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:54 AM >> > To: kerby@directory.apache.org >> > Subject: RE: Kerby 1.0 GA >> > >> > Sorry for wrong typo. >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. >> > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have >> > added lots of new features and bug fixes. >> > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and >> > 1.0.0 GA will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha3. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Jiajia >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:49 AM >> > To: kerby@directory.apache.org >> > Subject: Kerby 1.0 GA >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. >> > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have >> > added lots of new features and bug fixes. >> > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and >> > 1.0.0 GA will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha1. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Jiajia >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Colm O hEigeartaigh >> >> Talend Community Coder >> http://coders.talend.com >> > > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
Re: Kerby 1.0 GA
OK, I've merged a bunch of fixes and I'm now done for the 1.0.0-GA release. I see there are still a few open JIRAs. When do you anticipate calling the vote? Colm. On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> wrote: > There are a lot of open issues (including one "in progress") for the > 1.0.0-GA release in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB/fixforversion/12332775 > > It would be a good idea to go through the issues and decide which will be > fixed for the GA release, and which should be moved to a future release. > > Colm. > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > >> This makes sense. The GA should clean such kinds of codes. >> >> Regards, >> Kai >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 6:38 PM >> To: kerby@directory.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA >> >> One improvement I'd like to see before the 1.0 GA release is to improve >> the exception handling. There are many examples of catch statements that >> just have a printStackTrace() leading to NPEs down the line. Apart from >> that, +1 from me on the release: >> >> find . -name "*.java" -path "*/main/*" | xargs grep "printStackTrace()" | >> wc -l >> 30 >> >> Colm. >> >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: >> >> > Sounds cool! Thanks Jiajia for taking this step forward. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Kai >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:54 AM >> > To: kerby@directory.apache.org >> > Subject: RE: Kerby 1.0 GA >> > >> > Sorry for wrong typo. >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. >> > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have >> > added lots of new features and bug fixes. >> > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and >> > 1.0.0 GA will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha3. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Jiajia >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:49 AM >> > To: kerby@directory.apache.org >> > Subject: Kerby 1.0 GA >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. >> > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have >> > added lots of new features and bug fixes. >> > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and >> > 1.0.0 GA will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha1. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Jiajia >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Colm O hEigeartaigh >> >> Talend Community Coder >> http://coders.talend.com >> > > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
RE: Kerby 1.0 GA
This makes sense. The GA should clean such kinds of codes. Regards, Kai -Original Message- From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 6:38 PM To: kerby@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: Kerby 1.0 GA One improvement I'd like to see before the 1.0 GA release is to improve the exception handling. There are many examples of catch statements that just have a printStackTrace() leading to NPEs down the line. Apart from that, +1 from me on the release: find . -name "*.java" -path "*/main/*" | xargs grep "printStackTrace()" | wc -l 30 Colm. On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > Sounds cool! Thanks Jiajia for taking this step forward. > > Regards, > Kai > > -Original Message- > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:54 AM > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > Subject: RE: Kerby 1.0 GA > > Sorry for wrong typo. > > Hi all, > > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have > added lots of new features and bug fixes. > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and > 1.0.0 GA will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha3. > > Regards, > Jiajia > > -Original Message- > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:49 AM > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > Subject: Kerby 1.0 GA > > Hi all, > > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have > added lots of new features and bug fixes. > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and > 1.0.0 GA will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha1. > > Regards, > Jiajia > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
Re: Kerby 1.0 GA
One improvement I'd like to see before the 1.0 GA release is to improve the exception handling. There are many examples of catch statements that just have a printStackTrace() leading to NPEs down the line. Apart from that, +1 from me on the release: find . -name "*.java" -path "*/main/*" | xargs grep "printStackTrace()" | wc -l 30 Colm. On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > Sounds cool! Thanks Jiajia for taking this step forward. > > Regards, > Kai > > -Original Message- > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:54 AM > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > Subject: RE: Kerby 1.0 GA > > Sorry for wrong typo. > > Hi all, > > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have added > lots of new features and bug fixes. > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and 1.0.0 GA > will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha3. > > Regards, > Jiajia > > -Original Message- > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:jiajia...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:49 AM > To: kerby@directory.apache.org > Subject: Kerby 1.0 GA > > Hi all, > > We are going to start the Kerby 1.0.0 GA release progress. > It's more than one year since our last release 1.0.0-RC2, we have added > lots of new features and bug fixes. > And this release will include some blocking issues for Hadoop and 1.0.0 GA > will impact the next Hadoop release version 3.0.0-alpha1. > > Regards, > Jiajia > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
