Re: [kernel] Add patch for i.MX6 Utilite device dtb, drop old exynos patch

2013-10-30 Thread Amit Shah
On (Thu) 24 Oct 2013 [16:02:31], Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@fedoraproject.org wrote: diff --git a/config-arm-generic b/config-arm-generic index 96a95e5..aaa88ee

Re: [kernel] Add patch for i.MX6 Utilite device dtb, drop old exynos patch

2013-10-30 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Amit Shah amits...@gmx.net wrote: On (Thu) 24 Oct 2013 [16:02:31], Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@fedoraproject.org wrote: diff

Cloud product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Josh Boyer
Hi All, I realize the WG is just forming up and you have a lot of other items to cover for now, but I wanted to get this sent out and have people start thinking about it sooner rather than later. The kernel team has heard in the past that the Cloud group would like to see something of a more

Server product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Josh Boyer
Hi All, I realize the WG is just forming up and you have a lot of other items to cover for now, but I wanted to get this sent out and have people start thinking about it sooner rather than later. The kernel team is interested in what the Server WG sees as its requirements for the kernel package.

Server product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Josh Boyer
[ Resend with the right server mailing list address. Sorry kernel@ people.] Hi All, I realize the WG is just forming up and you have a lot of other items to cover for now, but I wanted to get this sent out and have people start thinking about it sooner rather than later. The kernel team is

Re: Cloud product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Robyn Bergeron
- Original Message - From: Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org To: Fedora Cloud SIG cl...@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: Kernel Fedora kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 7:07:46 AM Subject: Cloud product kernel requirements Hi All, I realize the WG

Re: Cloud product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
On Oct 30, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:07:46AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: Hi All, I realize the WG is just forming up and you have a lot of other items to cover for now, but I wanted to get this sent out and have people start

Re: Cloud product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:07:46AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: Hi All, I realize the WG is just forming up and you have a lot of other items to cover for now, but I wanted to get this sent out and have people start thinking about it sooner rather than later. The kernel team has heard in the

Re: Cloud product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:07:46AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: 4) Other cloudy stuff that I'm entirely unaware of that might be relevant. Explain it to me like I'm a child. I guess this would be a bad time to mention User-Mode Linux ...? Even I'm not sure if I'm joking here or not, but UML works

Re: Cloud product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:07:46AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: The kernel team has heard in the past that the Cloud group would like to see something of a more minimal kernel for usage in cloud images. We'd like to hear the requirements for what this smaller image would need to cover. I think

Re: Server product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 10:16 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: [ Resend with the right server mailing list address. Sorry kernel@ people.] Hi All, I realize the WG is just forming up and you have a lot of other items to cover for now, but I wanted to get this sent out and have people start

Re: Cloud product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Sandro red Mathys
Josh, thanks to reaching out to us on this. It's good to know the kernel maintainers are willing to discuss this openly. On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi All, I realize the WG is just forming up and you have a lot of other items to cover for now,

Re: Server product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/30/2013 11:10 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 10:16 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: [ Resend with the right server mailing list address. Sorry kernel@

Re: Server product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread David Strauss
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Massive 4096 multi-cored CPU machines with terabytes of DRAM and petabytes of storage, or more commodity style hardware used in heterogeneous environments, etc. The latter. We'd want a separate HPC group for 512+

Re: Server product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 10:51 -0700, David Strauss wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Massive 4096 multi-cored CPU machines with terabytes of DRAM and petabytes of storage, or more commodity style hardware used in heterogeneous environments,

Re: Server product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Prarit Bhargava
On 10/30/2013 02:10 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 10:51 -0700, David Strauss wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Massive 4096 multi-cored CPU machines with terabytes of DRAM and petabytes of storage, or more commodity style

Re: Server product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Prarit Bhargava pra...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/30/2013 02:10 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 10:51 -0700, David Strauss wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Massive 4096 multi-cored CPU machines with