Re: Deprecating old networking protocols

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:09 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > >> I think it is probably overdue in the DECnet case, however I >> did get a very happy with it for the most part. Anyway it is >> clear that nobody is maintaining it and it

Re: Enabling btusb autosuspend by default

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:32:12AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> I find it ironic that this misbehaving hardware is Intel's USB stuff, >> in their NUC, and powertop is an Intel managed project. I'd guess the >> powertop

Re: Reviving the hardware census

On 11/15/2017 05:45 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:> Does Census collect info on the CPU the user has and which > "flags" from /proc/cpuinfo. About once a year we have a discussion > on fedora-devel about for example unconditionally using SSE2 everywhere, > and for those discussions have CPU info would

Re: Reviving the hardware census

Hi, On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:49:02PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote: Hey folks, For some time now, Fedora has operated without a database of hardware users have. Smolt, the old hardware database, was retired in 2012[0] and its intended successor[1] was never deployed by Fedora Infrastructure. It

Re: Enabling btusb autosuspend by default

Hi, On 13-11-17 18:53, Laura Abbott wrote: On 11/13/2017 07:40 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi all, As mentioned before I'm working on trying to improve the OOTB power-consumption of Fedora Workstation on laptops (I need to create an F28 feature page for this). On many laptops the btusb device

Re: Enabling btusb autosuspend by default

Hi, On 14-11-17 15:49, Justin Forbes wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi all, As mentioned before I'm working on trying to improve the OOTB power-consumption of

Re: Enabling btusb autosuspend by default

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:32:12AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > I find it ironic that this misbehaving hardware is Intel's USB stuff, > in their NUC, and powertop is an Intel managed project. I'd guess the > powertop folks would already know better than to apply autosuspend to > Intel USB