Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Patrick Talbert on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_971423959 I am resolving this for now. If need be the discussion can be carried on in the mailing list or as a GL Issue here. ___ kernel mailing

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_948378932 A lot of the places RHEL is referenced are because they are RHEL bits. Fedora doesn't care what RHEL release is set to. The only real interaction I have with RHEL bits doing Fedora

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Herton R. Krzesinski on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_948254254 I have the same feeling as Neal, in which ark is rhel and we can have it as rhel. We have ark for historic reasons when the common kernel was introduced for rhel/fedora (except

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Thorsten Leemhuis on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_946854622 > Well, on the flip side: ARK is the RHEL configuration. Sorry, can't follow, so: Why? Some people will use kernel-ark just to build a new Fedora kernel (or some distro based on

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Neal Gompa on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_946635271 Well, on the flip side: ARK _is_ the RHEL configuration. Pretending it isn't does everyone a disservice. I actually wish that they just called it "rhel", since changes there need to be

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_945877674 >> which variables directly affected the SPEC file and which were used for other reasons in the Makefile. > >But is that relevant for people that do anything with kernel-ark or only

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Thorsten Leemhuis on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_945872976 > that changing RHEL/rhel references to ARK/(ark or dist) is not worth it I'd say they are, as such small details send a subliminal message to external participators and IMHO can

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Thorsten Leemhuis on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_945854686 > which variables directly affected the SPEC file and which were used for other reasons in the Makefile. But is that relevant for people that do anything with kernel-ark or only

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_945846156 >Ohh, and another quick comment: with all the changes you are currently preparing for the makefiles, how hard would it be to start making things like this a bit more neutral for

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_945837742 >Just out of curiosity, as it looks inconsistent (but I guess there might be a deeper reasoning behind if): why has one variable a "PACKAGE" prefix (with underscore behind it), and

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_945831127 Yep. Fixed. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Thorsten Leemhuis on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_945557245 Ohh, and another quick comment: with all the changes you are currently preparing for the makefiles, how hard would it be to start making things like this a bit more neutral for

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Thorsten Leemhuis on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_945463632 Just out of curiosity, as it looks inconsistent (but I guess there might be a deeper reasoning behind if): why has one variable a "PACKAGE" prefix (with underscore behind it), and

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Herton R. Krzesinski on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1779#note_945247919 I think you mean SPECKSUBLEVEL at the beginning here. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/docs: Add a description of kernel naming Add a file that describes how kernel NVRs are constructed. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/docs/index.rst b/redhat/docs/index.rst index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/docs/index.rst +++