Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] docs: Update docs to reflect newer workflow.

2021-04-02 Thread Don Zickus (via Email Bridge)
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/772#note_544043785 @hadess1 - created !995 to address your concerns. This should allow me to delete that line from the documentation. Let me re-push with your above 2 requests.

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] docs: Update docs to reflect newer workflow.

2020-12-11 Thread GitLab Bridge on behalf of Don Zickus
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/772#note_465400566 Yeah, I can remove that. Thanks! ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] docs: Update docs to reflect newer workflow.

2020-12-11 Thread GitLab Bridge on behalf of Don Zickus
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/772#note_465400429 I assume you are referring to internal scripts reference to 'master'. If so, I worry that not everyone will use 'upstream' as their reference name. And they may not 'git fetch upstream'

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] docs: Update docs to reflect newer workflow.

2020-12-04 Thread GitLab Bridge on behalf of Bastien Nocera
From: Bastien Nocera on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/772#note_460539176 The `git branch` call above doesn't switch to the `master` branch, so there shouldn't be any need to call `git checkout os-build` here. ___

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] docs: Update docs to reflect newer workflow.

2020-12-04 Thread GitLab Bridge on behalf of Bastien Nocera
From: Bastien Nocera on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/772#note_460539178 That means that the user will need to update the local master branch manually, right? Should the scripts reference `upstream/master` instead?