Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Sandro red Mathys r...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I think Josh is mostly there. He has 58MB + 5M vmlinuz + similar? firmwre. Firmware is owned by linux-firmware, not the kernel package. I didn't include it in my kernel numbers for that reason. He just has to cut 35MB or so from /lib/modules/. We can probably nickel and dime and review a lot of cruft to get there, but what is that 35MB really doing to get us anything? I am sure half of that can be removed by re-examining the minimal-list he sent (I can even help there). Right. Considering the bloat elsewhere in the distro, I think we can start with what I have and work from there if needed. Excellent progress there. So 35MB are already gone and I figure (re)moving graphics, sound and other obvious things will gain us quite some more MB. Nice job. No. 62MB are already gone. The 35MB was what is needed additionally to get to comparable numbers with ubuntu. Sound I could see dropping. Graphics, not so much. Really, I'm likely to start with what I have and if there are major reasons that get brought up (with data) to trim further, we can look at it. josh ___ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 04:28:56PM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote: What about Anaconda? I guess it does have its own mechanic to guarantee a kernel is installed, right? Probably hardcoded as well. Since we're going to build future images with ImageFactory/Anaconda, it must be possible to install either kernel-core or kernel (when installing with a kickstart file, that is). I think putting -kernel in %packages doesn't currently have much effect, does it? So if I'm right and Anaconda needs to be adapted for this, I'm happy to reach out to the Anaconda team on our behalf, if necessary. Yeah. We also need to have it not install the kernel (and there's no need to mess with a bootloader) for docker images, so that all kind of comes together. I'm beginning to like this whole idea less and less. josh ___ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:23:15AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Sandro red Mathys r...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I think Josh is mostly there. He has 58MB + 5M vmlinuz + similar? firmwre. Firmware is owned by linux-firmware, not the kernel package. I didn't include it in my kernel numbers for that reason. He just has to cut 35MB or so from /lib/modules/. We can probably nickel and dime and review a lot of cruft to get there, but what is that 35MB really doing to get us anything? I am sure half of that can be removed by re-examining the minimal-list he sent (I can even help there). Right. Considering the bloat elsewhere in the distro, I think we can start with what I have and work from there if needed. Excellent progress there. So 35MB are already gone and I figure (re)moving graphics, sound and other obvious things will gain us quite some more MB. Nice job. No. 62MB are already gone. The 35MB was what is needed additionally to get to comparable numbers with ubuntu. Sound I could see dropping. Graphics, not so much. Really, I'm likely to start with what I have and if there are major reasons that get brought up (with data) to trim further, we can look at it. I agree too. I think you did an awesome job Josh. Most of the fat is trimmed. :-) Anything more should really come with some numbers/data. Cheers, Don ___ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
Re: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:264 dev_watchdog+0x276/0x280()
On 07.03.2014 17:30, poma wrote: On 07.03.2014 00:32, poma wrote: ... After a few dozen tests with the vanilla commits, and with the same amount of rawhide kernels ... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=871694 Dan, Francois you are both welcome with comments! Thanks. Thomas U2. :) No barking w-dog, but now the network traffic is totally busted! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=871947 ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available ... Francois, do you have this[1] patch applicable for the recent 'r8169.c'? $ patch -p5 r8169-xmit.patch patching file r8169.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 5870. Hunk #2 succeeded at 5540 with fuzz 2 (offset -482 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 5641 (offset -494 lines). 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file r8169.c.rej poma [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=125961 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14962#c37 ___ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
