Hello.
After to have installed the lastest kernel (3.1-0-1) on my Fedora 16
x86_64bit, i get a kernel crash during boot.
Now the main problem is how to recover 'boot log' or 'messages log' in order
to ask help because it isnt created.
With kernel 3.0-1-3 there is not problem.
Maybe the crash
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 07:46:05PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 10/26/2011 06:49 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 06:41:16PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
There's been no work on ia64 in Fedora since roughly Fedora 9, we never
build
it, and it's not making a comeback.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:59:12PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
The digital picture are here:
http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/kernel-boot.tar.gz
According to our DM guys this fix just missed 3.1
http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-block.git;a=commit;h=f26d8f0562da76731cb049943a0e9d9fa81d946a
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:29:56PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:59:12PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
The digital picture are here:
http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/kernel-boot.tar.gz
According to our DM guys this fix just
Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:59:12PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
The digital picture are here:
http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/kernel-boot.tar.gz
According to our DM guys this fix just missed 3.1
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:43:22PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
This doesn't look like the same problem. Here we've got BUG: scheduling
while atomic. If it was the bug fixed by the above commits, then you
would hit a BUG_ON. I would start looking at the btrfs bits to see if
they're holding
-- Forwarded message --
From: Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/10/27
Subject: Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash
To: Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com
Should i be the victim ? :)
If need tests, i'm available.
2011/10/27 Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:20:51PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:43:22PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
This doesn't look like the same problem. Here we've got BUG: scheduling
while atomic. If it was the bug fixed by the above
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:09:05PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:43:22PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
This doesn't look like the same problem. Here we've got BUG: scheduling
while atomic. If it was the bug fixed by the above commits, then you
would hit a BUG_ON. I
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 02:06:54PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
We've been having monthly team meetings for a few months, and have decided
that
some of the material we end up discussing should really be shared with
a wider audience. Here are the minutes from this months meeting for example,
do you have multipath configured on your box?
If i have understand the 'multipath concept', yes. fdisk
outputhttp://www.fpaste.org/KXvm/
How often can you reproduce this problem.
Only with Kernel 3.1.
If fsck is enabled on / partition (btrfs filesystem) also with Kernel 3.0
2011/10/27 Vivek
11 matches
Mail list logo