On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk wrote:
It's generally useful. On other architectures the UDC capable hardware might
not be very common, but the dummy HCD makes it possible to use such hardware
for development and emulation of USB gadget driver code.
ACK from me
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Sandro red Mathys
r...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
So, in our case hardware drivers are rather unnecessary and the kernel
experts might know other ways to shrink the footprint for our limited
use cases. The kernel we require supports all primary architectures
(i686
Hi,
I'm not overly thrilled with having multi-tiered driver packages.
That leads to major headaches when we start shuffling things around
from one driver package to another. The current solution I have
prototyped is a kernel-core/kernel-drivers split. Here core could
be analogous to
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm not overly thrilled with having multi-tiered driver packages.
That leads to major headaches when we start shuffling things around
from one driver package to another. The current solution I have
prototyped is a
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:02:17AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 08:25:12PM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote:
For example, lets start with 100MB package requirement for the kernel (and
say 2 GB for
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk wrote:
It's generally useful. On other architectures the UDC capable hardware might
not be very common, but the dummy HCD makes it possible to use such
Am 05.03.2014 16:02, schrieb Josh Boyer:
FWIW, the existing kernel package installed today (a debug kernel
even) is ~142 MB. 123MB of that is the /lib/modules content. ~6MB of
that is vmlinuz. The remaining 13MB is the initramfs, which is
actually something that composes on the system
Hi,
Agree, I don't think it makes much sense to split things into many small
pieces.
- Do you need/want a firewall (requires iptables, etc)?
I'd say yes by default, but being able to remove it might be useful
(kernel-netfilter subpackage)?
So you agree multi-tiered subpackages
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:08:04 -0500,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
So you agree multi-tiered subpackages is a bad idea, but then you
propose a netfilter specific subpackage? ... Probably not. They'll
likely just be in kernel-core.
Couldn't the planned module provides
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:08:04 -0500,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
So you agree multi-tiered subpackages is a bad idea, but then you
propose a netfilter specific subpackage? ... Probably not. They'll
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:21 -0500
Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
Also, I just arbitrarly threw out 100MB, if we should start higher,
say 150MB, then it doesn't matter to me. :-)
This entire disk size optimization seems kind of weird to me.
I just booted a f20 offiical cloud image in
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:28:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:21 -0500
Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
Also, I just arbitrarly threw out 100MB, if we should start higher,
say 150MB, then it doesn't matter to me. :-)
This entire disk size optimization seems
Am 05.03.2014 17:28, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:21 -0500
Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
Also, I just arbitrarly threw out 100MB, if we should start higher,
say 150MB, then it doesn't matter to me. :-)
This entire disk size optimization seems kind of weird to
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 05.03.2014 17:28, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:21 -0500
Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
Also, I just arbitrarly threw out 100MB, if we should start
higher, say 150MB, then it
Am 05.03.2014 17:45, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 05.03.2014 17:28, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:21 -0500
Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
Also, I just arbitrarly threw out 100MB, if we should
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 10:59 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:08:04 -0500,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
So you agree multi-tiered subpackages is a bad idea, but then you
propose a
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:08:04AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Depends on what is targeted. Strictly cloud? Or also someone running
Fedora as a guest in virt-manager / boxes?
I'm of the opinion the latter is probably what we should shoot for.
It's going to be the broadest target that is still
It's generally useful. On other architectures the UDC capable hardware might
not be very common, but the dummy HCD makes it possible to use such hardware
for development and emulation of USB gadget driver code.
ACK from me
I'm not at all sold on this to be honest. Coverity just picked up a
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm not overly thrilled with having multi-tiered driver packages.
That leads to major headaches when we start shuffling things around
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:02:17AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 08:25:12PM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote:
For example, lets start
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
in general you need to multiply the wasted space for each instance
Exactly, you usually have hundreds or even thousands of instances
running. Sure,
21 matches
Mail list logo
