Re: kdbus and Fedora

2015-05-06 Thread Harald Hoyer
On 05.05.2015 20:43, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote: On 05.05.2015 19:50, Josh Boyer wrote: Hi All, Harald and I were recently talking about kdbus and how it plays into Fedora. Right now, the kernel-playground COPR is carrying the

Re: kdbus and Fedora

2015-05-06 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote: On 05.05.2015 20:43, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote: On 05.05.2015 19:50, Josh Boyer wrote: Hi All, Harald and I were recently talking about kdbus and how it plays

Re: kdbus and Fedora

2015-05-06 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 05/06/2015 09:57 AM, Amit Shah wrote: On (Wed) 06 May 2015 [11:45:38], Harald Hoyer wrote: One possibility is to enable kdbus by default until alpha phase. The problem with that is all systemd testing is useless once we're out of Alpha. Similar things have happened in the past. Which

Re: kdbus and Fedora

2015-05-06 Thread Peter Robinson
Harald and I were recently talking about kdbus and how it plays into Fedora. Right now, the kernel-playground COPR is carrying the kdbus patches, but that isn't widely used and isn't included in a broad test base. Obviously our distribution is heavily entwined with D-Bus and we were looking

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

2015-05-06 Thread Harald Hoyer
On 06.05.2015 13:55, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Hi, In our model: - /usr is vendor supplied - /var is OS state - /etc is admin config - /boot is machine owned and sometimes even shared with other OS (EFI partition Well, at least in fedora + rhel the efi partition is /boot/efi ... I

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

2015-05-06 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:29:36AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:34:41AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: Meh, not in CC and not subscribed to kernel-list. Anyway... On 04.05.2015 19:57, Tom Callaway wrote: On 05/04/2015 01:49 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: So if I

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

2015-05-06 Thread Don Zickus
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:34:41AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: Meh, not in CC and not subscribed to kernel-list. Anyway... On 04.05.2015 19:57, Tom Callaway wrote: On 05/04/2015 01:49 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: So if I understand the patch correctly, your usecase will still be valid as the

Re: kdbus and Fedora

2015-05-06 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On (Wed) 06 May 2015 [11:45:38], Harald Hoyer wrote: One possibility is to enable kdbus by default until alpha phase. The problem with that is all systemd testing is useless once we're out of Alpha. Similar things

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

2015-05-06 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:00:08PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:48:00AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:41:28AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: Not that my opinion matters much, but I

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

2015-05-06 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:48:00AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:41:28AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: Not that my opinion matters much, but I think this is an interesting mind shift. The end result is the same as today, just extra files in /lib/modules/`uname -r`,

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

2015-05-06 Thread Don Zickus
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:41:28AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: Not that my opinion matters much, but I think this is an interesting mind shift. The end result is the same as today, just extra files in /lib/modules/`uname -r`, right? Actually, I was hoping some other kernel maintainers would