Re: [PATCH] config: Enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 08:49:24AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 12/01/2016 06:58 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:53:06AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Don Zickus wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:25:30PM

Re: [PATCH] config: Enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS

On 12/01/2016 06:58 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:53:06AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Don Zickus wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:25:30PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > I don't think it would be a bad idea to

Re: [PATCH] config: Enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:53:06AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Don Zickus wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:25:30PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: >> > > > I don't

Re: Kernel configurations for Fedora -- a proposal

On 11/30/2016 05:54 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: >> On 11/21/2016 10:46 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration >>> in Fedora >>>

Re: [PATCH] config: Enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:53:06AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Don Zickus wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:25:30PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > > > > I don't think it would be a bad idea to enable in rawhide and see how > > it works

Re: [PATCH] config: Enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Don Zickus wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:25:30PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > > > I don't think it would be a bad idea to enable in rawhide and see how > it works out, from there it will trickle down as the stable releases get >