Hi Don,
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 13:45 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> Thanks for responding. Laura already provided some good feedback.
> I was curious if some of this would correctly for our non-kernel package
> stuff we build. I might be reading Laura's patch wrong, but I think some of
> the options
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 10:20 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 04/12/2017 03:55 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > I am happy you seem able to use the defines instead of having to
> > override the whole find-debuginfo call. Please let me know if there are
> > other defines you need/want.
> >
>
> I
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > Mark W.,
> >
> > Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with
> > the kernel?
> >
> > > @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires:
On 04/12/2017 03:55 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
>> Mark W.,
>>
>> Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with
>> the kernel?
>>
>>> @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires: pciutils-devel gettext ncurses-devel
Hi,
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> Mark W.,
>
> Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with
> the kernel?
>
> > @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires: pciutils-devel gettext ncurses-devel
> > BuildConflicts: rhbuildsys(DiskFree) < 500Mb
> >
I mean copy of cpuinfo in bugzilla ABRT bug reports as an attachment in first
question.
Sorry for ambiguity.
- Original Message -
From: "Julius Milan"
To: tools-t...@redhat.com, rhkernel...@redhat.com,
kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2017
Hi
I would like to know your opinion about adding copy of /proc/cpuinfo file to
ABRT bug reports
as there are crashes related to HW acceleration.
(https://github.com/abrt/abrt/issues/1171)
Would you find it useful?
And would you find useful adding of some information from cpuinfo to faf (abrt