Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

2017-04-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Don, On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 13:45 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > Thanks for responding. Laura already provided some good feedback. > I was curious if some of this would correctly for our non-kernel package > stuff we build. I might be reading Laura's patch wrong, but I think some of > the options

Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

2017-04-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 10:20 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 04/12/2017 03:55 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > I am happy you seem able to use the defines instead of having to > > override the whole find-debuginfo call. Please let me know if there are > > other defines you need/want. > > > > I

Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

2017-04-12 Thread Don Zickus
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > > Mark W., > > > > Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with > > the kernel? > > > > > @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires:

Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

2017-04-12 Thread Laura Abbott
On 04/12/2017 03:55 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: >> Mark W., >> >> Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with >> the kernel? >> >>> @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires: pciutils-devel gettext ncurses-devel

Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

2017-04-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > Mark W., > > Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with > the kernel? > > > @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires: pciutils-devel gettext ncurses-devel > > BuildConflicts: rhbuildsys(DiskFree) < 500Mb > >

Re: cpuinfo in ABRT reports, your opinion

2017-04-12 Thread Julius Milan
I mean copy of cpuinfo in bugzilla ABRT bug reports as an attachment in first question. Sorry for ambiguity. - Original Message - From: "Julius Milan" To: tools-t...@redhat.com, rhkernel...@redhat.com, kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2017

cpuinfo in ABRT reports, your opinion

2017-04-12 Thread Julius Milan
Hi I would like to know your opinion about adding copy of /proc/cpuinfo file to ABRT bug reports as there are crashes related to HW acceleration. (https://github.com/abrt/abrt/issues/1171) Would you find it useful? And would you find useful adding of some information from cpuinfo to faf (abrt