On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Nathaniel McCallum
> wrote:
>> Turning it into a hash doesn't solve the tracking problem. It only
>> prevents the attacker from knowing a list of serial numbers.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Nathaniel McCallum
wrote:
> Turning it into a hash doesn't solve the tracking problem. It only
> prevents the attacker from knowing a list of serial numbers. I suspect
> keeping hashes of identifying information will likely cause
>
Turning it into a hash doesn't solve the tracking problem. It only
prevents the attacker from knowing a list of serial numbers. I suspect
keeping hashes of identifying information will likely cause
controversy.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:19:04AM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>> Agreed completely. But I still need someone with experience using lshw
>> to write a data processor (json => SQL) for that data. Also, we will
>> need to
Wow! You're fast at getting stuff upstream! ;)
We still need a volunteer for the census side of things.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:19:04AM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>> Agreed completely. But I still need someone with
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:19:04AM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> Agreed completely. But I still need someone with experience using lshw
> to write a data processor (json => SQL) for that data. Also, we will
> need to sanitize the lshw output to ensure we omit identifying
> information. For
Agreed completely. But I still need someone with experience using lshw
to write a data processor (json => SQL) for that data. Also, we will
need to sanitize the lshw output to ensure we omit identifying
information. For example, ip addresses on the network interfaces need
to be filtered out. It
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:02:05PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> It isn't documented in F27, but it does work. However, we probably
> want at least this patch:
> https://github.com/lyonel/lshw/commit/135a853c60582b14c5b67e5cd988a8062d9896f4
And some beaker stuff looks interesting in