Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 00:00 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > But koji isn't carved in stone, is it? > > No, but in the current status quo it can't pull from random sources > (Fedora config, not koji in general), this is an

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 17:27 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> If you're talking about local builds, it isn't tricky at all. Someone >> would just need to adjust the kernel.spec to do it and/or write steps >> to have your local

Re: RFC: Moving kernel-tools out of kernel.spec

On 12/08/2017 04:35 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: On 12/05/2017 12:50 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: On 11/28/2017 02:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time. Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace tools that live under the

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 17:21 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Git apply doesn't need a git repo. It is designed to be a patch replacement. > > Interesting. I wasn't aware of that. Seems odd? Apparently a conscious decision:

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 12:32 -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: >> On 01/02/2018 08:35 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: >> > A bit off topic: I suppose at the ultimate goal is to do rpmbuild from >> > within >> > a proper git clone of the

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 16:28 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> So if you want to use git apply instead of patch, I have no objections >> that I can remember. It'll just require some extra work to make sure >> the git repo actually

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 12:32 -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 01/02/2018 08:35 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > A bit off topic: I suppose at the ultimate goal is to do rpmbuild from > > within > > a proper git clone of the kernel repository. Ie, using a branch with > > Fedora's > > patches, a specfile,

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 16:28 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > So if you want to use git apply instead of patch, I have no objections > that I can remember. It'll just require some extra work to make sure > the git repo actually exists and that doesn't break other things. Git apply doesn't need a git

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 12/30/2017 04:52 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: >> >> 0) The v4.14.10 stable updates adds a new executable (tools/objtool/sync- >> check.sh). Somehow this was added non-executable during my local build of >> v4.14.10 (on fc26,

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On 01/02/2018 08:35 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: On Sun, 2017-12-31 at 18:13 -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: On 12/30/2017 04:52 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: 2) Would it make sense to further gitify the specfile and move from patch to "git apply" here (and a few other places)? Or should we expect patch to do the

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 05:13:59PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 09:50 -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 01:52:49PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec > > > index 965345c2a26e..b2a1ffbe843d 100644 > > > --- a/kernel.spec > >

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Sun, 2017-12-31 at 18:13 -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 12/30/2017 04:52 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > 2) Would it make sense to further gitify the specfile and move from patch to > > "git apply" here (and a few other places)? Or should we expect patch to do > > the > > right thing? (In the

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 09:50 -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 01:52:49PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec > > index 965345c2a26e..b2a1ffbe843d 100644 > > --- a/kernel.spec > > +++ b/kernel.spec > > @@ -1267,8 +1267,9 @@ fi > > # released_kernel

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 01:52:49PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > 0) The v4.14.10 stable updates adds a new executable (tools/objtool/sync- > check.sh). Somehow this was added non-executable during my local build of > v4.14.10 (on fc26, that is). This made the build fail: > > [...] > + make -s