From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654#note_1582704141
Agreed, I tried to make sure nothing changed for users. This is just an
internal thing.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel
From: Don Zickus
Add clang config framework
Compiling for clang is getting trickier to do because the configs are
different than gcc in some cases. Mimic the kgcov framework (which uses
priority files) to setup clang to be easier to update their configs.
This leads to strange cases where
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654#note_1579247973
@tales-aparecida pushed fix. thanks!
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654
Compiling for clang is getting trickier to do because the configs are
different than gcc in some cases. Mimic the kgcov framework to setup
clang to be easier to update their configs
From: Don Zickus
Apply partial snippet configs to all configs
There is a macro all_arch_configs that tries to optimize what configs we
apply the partial snippets to. While it speeds up things up a bit, it
creates conflicts with CLANG options. The process_configs.sh script
still processes
From: Don Zickus
Remove unpackaged kgcov config files
The kgcov option is applied as a partial snippet in the spec file. The
generated kernel-*-kgcov.config are not packaged and therefore unused.
My motivation here is because they conflict with the CLANG options when
I overlay the CLANG
From: Don Zickus
Add target_branch for gen_config_patches.sh
To support new config updates in other brances besides os-build, we need
to be more flexible with the staging branch. Currently new configs get
added to configs/$date/. This won't work when new branches
like os-build-rt-devel and os
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2732
This is an attempt to automate the rt and automotive devel branches
using the upstream linux-rt-devel tree as the base combined with
os-build.
The overall process isn't too complicated
From: Don Zickus
Add new os-build targets: rt-devel and automotive-devel
This is an attempt to automate the rt and automotive devel branches
using the upstream linux-rt-devel tree as the base combined with
os-build.
The overall process isn't too complicated but there are enough steps to
make
From: Don Zickus
Apply partial snippet configs to all configs
There is a macro all_arch_configs that tries to optimize what configs we
apply the partial snippets to. While it speeds up things up a bit, it
creates conflicts with CLANG options. The process_configs.sh script
still processes
From: Don Zickus
Add clang config framework
Compiling for clang is getting trickier to do because the configs are
different than gcc in some cases. Mimic the kgcov framework (which uses
priority files) to setup clang to be easier to update their configs.
This leads to strange cases where
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654
Compiling for clang is getting trickier to do because the configs are
different than gcc in some cases. Mimic the kgcov framework to setup
clang to be easier to update their configs
From: Don Zickus
Remove unpackaged kgcov config files
The kgcov option is applied as a partial snippet in the spec file. The
generated kernel-*-kgcov.config are not packaged and therefore unused.
My motivation here is because they conflict with the CLANG options when
I overlay the CLANG
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654#note_1590158249
rebased to latest code to see if that fixes the strange x86 build issues
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654
Compiling for clang is getting trickier to do because the configs are
different than gcc in some cases. Mimic the kgcov framework to setup
clang to be easier to update their configs
From: Don Zickus
Remove unpackaged kgcov config files
The kgcov option is applied as a partial snippet in the spec file. The
generated kernel-*-kgcov.config are not packaged and therefore unused.
My motivation here is because they conflict with the CLANG options when
I overlay the CLANG
From: Don Zickus
Apply partial snippet configs to all configs
There is a macro all_arch_configs that tries to optimize what configs we
apply the partial snippets to. While it speeds up things up a bit, it
creates conflicts with CLANG options. The process_configs.sh script
still processes
From: Don Zickus
Add clang config framework
Compiling for clang is getting trickier to do because the configs are
different than gcc in some cases. Mimic the kgcov framework (which uses
priority files) to setup clang to be easier to update their configs.
This leads to strange cases where
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654#note_1590162968
updated with Jan's suggestion about 'cp %{SOURCE3001} .'
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654#note_1590160321
Yeah, I wasn't sure if folks had a script that relied on a kernel-local or not
so I left it. But will will happily update to take your suggestion
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654#note_1590319086
@jstancek with your ack, can I assume this is resolved?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654#note_1590321109
@ptalbert what does Merge Warning mean? I rebased this to top of tree for os-
build.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel
From: Don Zickus
Add target_branch for gen_config_patches.sh
To support new config updates in other brances besides os-build, we need
to be more flexible with the staging branch. Currently new configs get
added to configs/$date/. This won't work when new branches
like os-build-rt-devel and os
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654#note_1584560878
It appears I can only 'cp file1 file2' and not multiple files. I am going to
skip this suggestion unless someone can point out what I am messing up
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654
Compiling for clang is getting trickier to do because the configs are
different than gcc in some cases. Mimic the kgcov framework to setup
clang to be easier to update their configs
From: Don Zickus
Add clang config framework
Compiling for clang is getting trickier to do because the configs are
different than gcc in some cases. Mimic the kgcov framework (which uses
priority files) to setup clang to be easier to update their configs.
This leads to strange cases where
From: Don Zickus
Remove unpackaged kgcov config files
The kgcov option is applied as a partial snippet in the spec file. The
generated kernel-*-kgcov.config are not packaged and therefore unused.
My motivation here is because they conflict with the CLANG options when
I overlay the CLANG
From: Don Zickus
Apply partial snippet configs to all configs
There is a macro all_arch_configs that tries to optimize what configs we
apply the partial snippets to. While it speeds up things up a bit, it
creates conflicts with CLANG options. The process_configs.sh script
still processes
From: Don Zickus
Add target_branch for gen_config_patches.sh
To support new config updates in other brances besides os-build, we need
to be more flexible with the staging branch. Currently new configs get
added to configs/$date/. This won't work when new branches
like os-build-rt-devel and os
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2732
This is an attempt to automate the rt and automotive devel branches
using the upstream linux-rt-devel tree as the base combined with
os-build.
The overall process isn't too complicated
From: Don Zickus
Add new os-build targets: rt-devel and automotive-devel
This is an attempt to automate the rt and automotive devel branches
using the upstream linux-rt-devel tree as the base combined with
os-build.
The overall process isn't too complicated but there are enough steps to
make
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654#note_1584576862
Yeah, I am scratching my head on that too. I got this working as a starter.
Open to ideas.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654#note_1584466006
Resolving the thread as it appears stan agreed with Jan's reply below.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2654
Compiling for clang is getting trickier to do because the configs are
different than gcc in some cases. Mimic the kgcov framework to setup
clang to be easier to update their configs
From: Don Zickus
Remove unpackaged kgcov config files
The kgcov option is applied as a partial snippet in the spec file. The
generated kernel-*-kgcov.config are not packaged and therefore unused.
My motivation here is because they conflict with the CLANG options when
I overlay the CLANG
From: Don Zickus
Apply partial snippet configs to all configs
There is a macro all_arch_configs that tries to optimize what configs we
apply the partial snippets to. While it speeds up things up a bit, it
creates conflicts with CLANG options. The process_configs.sh script
still processes
From: Don Zickus
Add clang config framework
Compiling for clang is getting trickier to do because the configs are
different than gcc in some cases. Mimic the kgcov framework (which uses
priority files) to setup clang to be easier to update their configs.
This leads to strange cases where
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2749#note_1607846588
@codonell-rh @vmalikrh - patching samples/bpf/Makefile (add quotes around
TPROGS_LDFLAGS) allowed me to use TPROGS_LDFLAGS correctly.
@vmalikrh - who to send this patch to upstream? I
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2749#note_1609196658
I guess I spoke too soon, moving the TPROGS_xxx before make still causes rpm
to fail. hmm...
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2749#note_1609190998
@hertonrk-rh @vmalikrh - moving TPROGS_xxx to before make resolved my missing
includes issue. But I see what @vmalikrh means for that one target.
The rpm still builds, so I think we
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2757#note_1611091360
@herbert.xu2 thanks! Is there a reason why this isn't pushed upstream and
needs to be RHEL-only? (We ask on all RHEL-only patches
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2749#note_1612950237
@vmalikrh thanks for the fixes! I tried your suggestions and got this new
error:
```plaintext
+ /usr/bin/make -s 'HOSTCFLAGS=-O2 -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches
-pipe -Wall
From: Don Zickus
Fix binutils breakage
The binutils package in Rawhide has stricter checks about PIE/PIC code
and will start reporting errors if it detects mixing and matching no-PIE
with PIE binaries (especially around bpf binaries).
Example errors look like:
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccL7dkfR.o
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2749#note_1602503582
@vmalikrh - FYI as the approval rules won't automatically add you.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2749#note_1617007832
@vmalikrh - were you able to push patches upstream? we were looking to bring
them in prematurely for ARK until upstream merges them. This helps move
binutils forward
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2526#note_1521767186
@mlangsdorf @jlinton - review?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2639#note_1521766040
@raquini @ddutile - mm review?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le
From: Don Zickus
Fix tarball creation logic
The create tarball logic tried to determine if the tarball existed or
not by using a git sha. However the check always failed because the
current sha was shortened and the tarball sha was the full 40 digits.
Correct this by converting the shortened
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1781#note_949736929
I used a macro to address this. This seems to work. Thoughts?
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1786
___
kernel
From: Don Zickus
[redhat] Explicitly set srpm requirements
It isn't clear what packages are necessary to be installed to generate
the srpm for the kernel. Use another spec macro to call out the exact
packages needed. This allows a makefile target to be used to verify the
right packages have
From: Ondrej Mosnacek
[redhat] Makefile: drop duplicate dist-sources deps
do-rpmbuild itself already depends on dist-sources, thus no need to
specify when we depend on do-rpmbuild already.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek
diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile
index blahblah..blahblah
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1786
Developers want to build a srpm locally and submit it to a build server like
Koji. The current process checks the BuildRequires in the kernel.spec file to
ensure all the right packages
From: Don Zickus
[redhat] Add dist-buildreq-check for binary rpm builds
By simplifying the package check to srpm only, we neglect to check
the packaging for local binary rpm building. Add that Makefile
dependency for those cases.
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus
diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1786#note_951720936
@hertonrk-rh @prarit @jmflinuxtx
To answer a variety of questions. Yes srpm processes the configs. It kinda
has to otherwise what is rpmbuild going to use to build the kernel? :-)
Why
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1786#note_951705198
I can't prove it mathematically, but in order to build the SRPM, you need to
build the configs. What does dist-configs-check do that regular dist-configs
does not? And if it is missing
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1786#note_951723323
Sure, but it doesn't describe why some rpmbuild commands get it, while others
do not. Hence the -binary part. If you are building binaries you needed the
extra suffix. This makes
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1786#note_951732268
Oh and @omos filed this https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-
ark/-/merge_requests/1781 because he got hit with my buildreqs change from
last week. That MR kinda undoes the check
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1741#note_954969180
I don't know who or what was originally blocking this thread, but I believe it
to be resolved (at least Prarit and Veronika appear to think things are good).
So I am clicking the resolve
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1741#note_954971065
@jmflinuxtx - up to you if you want to sneak this in before Monday's merge
window opening. The last commit in this series is the piece that enables the
cki part (run_self_test: true
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1811#note_962560082
@ptalbert @jmflinuxtx @prarit - so this breaks the self-tests and if included
will break self-tests for all future configs. Hopefully this doesn't get
merged until that is resolved
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1811#note_962630004
It does. Though I have a patch to reduce it down to changes to the %%SPEC
lines, which is more realistic. I have to wait for @prarit to come back from
PTO to review it. But for this MR
From: Don Zickus
Fix nightly merge CI
My recent MR for builddeps broke the nightly merge CI scripts because
the script was using the wrong supported container. Update the CI
script to use the correct supported CKI container image for ARK.
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus
diff --git a/.gitlab
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1757#note_948427545
It definitely depends on the repo. I think I had so more garbage that it
inflated things. 'git gc' removed enough junk that my 'git log --oneline' is
down to 12.
Looking into this more
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1757#note_948374003
maybe it is just me, but a 'git log --oneline' shows 13 chars already.
git log --oneline --abbrev=8|grep -Ev "^[0-9a-f]{,10} "
shows me 9 commits that are 11 chars l
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1781#note_948589022
@hertonrk-rh agreed. There are srpm deps: https://cki-
project.gitlab.io/kernel-ark/#cloning-the-repository
Now I will agree that dist-buildreq-check might have swung to far in one
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1887#note_1002826830
with containers!412 merged, this MR is unnecessary. Closing.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
From: Don Zickus
Test: Broken code, do not merge
diff --git a/redhat/docs/index.rst b/redhat/docs/index.rst
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/docs/index.rst
+++ b/redhat/docs/index.rst
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Contributor Guide
Maintainer Guide
-.. toctree
From: Don Zickus
Use new HOME path in ssh command
CKI recently updated the HOME variable to point to /cki instead of
/root. The .gitlab-ci.yml file applies all ssh tweaks to ~/.ssh/ which
is /cki/.ssh. However, ssh still uses /root/.ssh. So all the tweaks
are ignored and ssh connections
From: Don Zickus
Enable CKI on os-build MRs only
Not all the old Fedora branches have the latest Makefile and specfile
changes to support the self-test check. Disable the Fedora branches for
now.
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus
diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml
index blahblah..blahblah
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1878#note_990962307
Thank you!
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Don Zickus
Test: Broken code, do not merge
diff --git a/redhat/docs/index.rst b/redhat/docs/index.rst
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/docs/index.rst
+++ b/redhat/docs/index.rst
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Contributor Guide
Maintainer Guide
-.. toctree
From: Don Zickus
Test: Broken code, do not merge
diff --git a/redhat/docs/index.rst b/redhat/docs/index.rst
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/docs/index.rst
+++ b/redhat/docs/index.rst
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Contributor Guide
Maintainer Guide
-.. toctree
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1774#note_941572465
Hmm, I remembered centos-stream, but forgot about centos.
I will push that update. Not sure if that change or just using '!{?fedora}'
is easier
From: Don Zickus
Add system-sb-certs for RHEL-9
Copy the RHEL-9 signing requirement over to ARK. This change is wrapped
with "{?rhel}{?centos} && !{?eln}" to allow Fedora and ELN to continue
using their signing technology.
The system-sb-certs is just a metapackage for ei
From: Don Zickus
Fix dist-buildcheck-reqs
The check for rpmspec buildrequires wasn't working because of a Makefile
typo. Verified by deleting known buildreqs.
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus
diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/Makefile
+++ b
From: Don Zickus
Add system-sb-certs for RHEL-9
Copy the RHEL-9 signing requirement over to ARK. This change is wrapped
with "{?rhel} && !{?eln}" to allow Fedora and ELN to continue using
their signing technology.
The system-sb-certs is just a metapackage for either rhel-sb-
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1774#note_940375865
@hertonrk-rh @jmflinuxtx - is this a respectful way to wrap this buildreq?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2095#note_1139862125
@jwilsonrh - +1. directories should have a 'theme'. I am ok with
'scripts/gating'. or 'scripts/osci' as those scripts are specific to osci
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2083#note_1138460406
@ahs3 - we don't see any code using this config. Am I missing something
(other than the defconfig file)?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2112#note_1146743250
@hertonrk-rh - you had to enable this for rhel-9 it appears. can you provide
some background?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1950#note_1114646949
@jwilsonrh - can you reply here?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le
From: Don Zickus
Remove unused ci scripts
The ARK CI process has changed over time and the following scripts are
no longer used. Remove them to avoid confusion for future contributors.
* ark-rebase-patches.sh
used to rebase patches for ark-patches. ark-patches was replaced by
the current
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1533#note_1122556452
@Lyude - do you have time for a quick review?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1786#note_1065198628
Closing in favor of https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-
ark/-/merge_requests/1900
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1975#note_1056132350
Hmm. long ago, creating the linux tarball took a couple of minutes. So if
you were constantly running make dist-srpm and friends that couple of minutes
got annoying (much like how dist
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1980#note_1067725269
Thanks @hertonrk-rh for this series! It looks to be an improvement in the
overall workflow (which shows with the later commits removing workarounds). I
don't have any objections
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1980#note_1067842595
Thanks! I think this series is good prep work for the real fix, which is to
correctly handle the marker != last_marker case (merge update). This patchset
will just say 'rebase', which
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1980#note_1067930412
Perfect example env! So a couple of things. I believe the 'rebase' word is
incorrect and the 'Resolves' line should be removed?? (I thought it was with
your sed magic?).
Sadly, I
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1980#note_1067980884
I am happy if Justin is happy. Thanks @hertonrk-rh !
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
From: Don Zickus
Revert "redhat: fix elf got hardening for vm tools"
This reverts commit eb5aebd77015bc57616c5d05a7b6206c8ff871cb.
A recent rework of the tools/vm area relies on a proper CFLAGS
definition to include the proper header files. The kernel.spec file
purposely overwrites
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2236#note_1219424373
/block
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
From: Don Zickus
Revert "redhat: fix elf got hardening for vm tools"
This reverts commit eb5aebd77015bc57616c5d05a7b6206c8ff871cb.
A recent rework of the tools/vm area relies on a proper CFLAGS
definition to include the proper header files. The kernel.spec file
purposely overwrites
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2236#note_1219422925
@hertonrk-rh - the revert is Frantisek's change. Not sure if you are familiar
with it? I was wondering if we could replace 'CFLAGS=' with 'EXTRA_CFLAGS='
and have it still help
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2225#note_1216392018
@jmflinuxtx - hmm, did we agree to avoid touching common and only let a bot do
that?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2240#note_1230246925
@prarit - hmm, ok I am torn here. I thank you for respecting the 'do not
break ARK approach'. But then I wonder what is the value of this in ARK
(besides the obvious don't lose changes
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2165#note_1203471910
ugh how dumb of me. I can create an MR that 'touch'es or 'rm -f'. Any
preference @jmflinuxtx @ptalbert ?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2165#note_1203488108
created !2183 with 'touch' fix
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2174#note_119735
Agreed. What problem are we solving here?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2157#note_1177768175
@jmflinuxtx @scweaver @prarit - here is my attempt to downplay the 'common'
directory for configs.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel
From: Don Zickus
Remove recommendation to use 'common' for config changes.
Config changes should be focused on the 'ark' or 'fedora' directory.
Update the docs to promote that.
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus
diff --git a/redhat/docs/submitting-contributions.rst
b/redhat/docs/submitting
501 - 600 of 770 matches
Mail list logo
