Re: [fedora-arm] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting

On 7/19/19 1:09 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > On 7/4/19 6:12 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > >> I think we have identified the root cause of the 32-bit builder issue. >> Many thanks to Paul and Peter for assistance in debugging. Here's my >> write-up, and we'll work with the vendor

Re: [fedora-arm] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting

On 7/4/19 6:12 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > I think we have identified the root cause of the 32-bit builder issue. > Many thanks to Paul and Peter for assistance in debugging. Here's my > write-up, and we'll work with the vendor on a suitable mitigation to > workaround any errata

extend initramfs archive format to support xattrs

Since it came up upstream, I've added a reference in the existing BZ that was long since asking for this feature in userspace cpio: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771926 Jon. -- Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop ___

Re: [PATCHv2 00/14] arm64: VMAP_STACK support

phone > On Sep 12, 2017, at 10:24, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Jon Masters <j...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Can you enable CONFIG_VMAP_STACK for aarch64 kernels once this lands in >> 4.14? I'd like to see

Fwd: [PATCHv2 00/14] arm64: VMAP_STACK support

Can you enable CONFIG_VMAP_STACK for aarch64 kernels once this lands in 4.14? I'd like to see any problems flagged early and often on this... Jon. Forwarded Message Subject: [PATCHv2 00/14] arm64: VMAP_STACK support Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:50:35 +0100 From: Mark Rutland

arm64: F26 vs F25 kernel config for 4.9 (48-bit VA)

Hi Folks, A quick reminder that, while 48-bit VA is enabled in rawhide/26: commit c0f22caded1d549e532d2ab3ce767f8f3d2206f8 Author: Peter Robinson Date: Mon Oct 31 15:45:58 2016 + arm64: Enable 48bit VA Care should be taken to ensure this doesn't

Re: [PATCH] modsign: Always enforce module signing in a Secure Boot, environment

Josh, kernel folks, This patch needs a tweak s/CONFIG_MODULES/CONFIG_MODULE_SIG/ for the definition of sig_enforce for those arches not doing module signing. Jon. ___ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fwd: [PATCH] ARM: Fix restoration of IP scratch register when auditing syscalls

On 04/30/2012 12:56 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:50:56PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:47 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 02:40:01AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: Going to assume you forwarded this here because you want it applied

Fwd: [PATCH] ARM: Fix restoration of IP scratch register when auditing syscalls

Original Message Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Fix restoration of IP scratch register when auditing syscalls Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:38:24 -0400 From: Jon Masters j...@jonmasters.org To: Linux ARM Kernel linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org CC: Jon Masters j...@redhat.com, Al Viro v

Fwd: [fedora-arm] Fwd: Re: Inconsistent kallsyms data on ARM.

since we haven't satisfied that yet with a build? (a conditional just for ARM, not for everyone) Jon. Original Message Subject: [fedora-arm] Fwd: Re: Inconsistent kallsyms data on ARM. Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:02:42 -0400 From: Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org Organization

Re: Proposal to add build of kernel-backports package to kernel.spec

Hey John, I looked at the module-init-tools patch. It's fine to incorporate if this is the chosen plan (to do the backports package). In that case, either you or I (or anyone else) is free to build the updated m-i-t. Jon. ___ kernel mailing list

Re: [fedora-arm] adding fake-kernel to repository

On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 13:29 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 09:54 +0200, Dan Horák wrote: Similar package (fake-build-provides [1], [2]) is required in koji on platforms where 32bit userspace lives with

Re: [fedora-arm] adding fake-kernel to repository

On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:14:56AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: Folks: we currently don't have a kernel package in Fedora ARM. Several people are working on fixing this by working on kernel images that support various targets

Re: [PATCH] disable CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DETECT_IRQ

On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 10:41 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: The autodetection of IRQ on standard serial ports perhaps made sense on old hardware, but not anymore. These days we know the IRQ from PnP info or simply assume the standard IRQ setting (IRQ4 for 0x3F8, IRQ3 for 0x2F8). Sounds

Re: Ath9k driver

On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 17:33 -0800, JD wrote: ath: disagrees about version of symbol wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory ath: Unknown symbol wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory (err -22) ath: disagrees about version of symbol freq_reg_info ath: Unknown symbol freq_reg_info (err -22) For some reason the

Broadcom brcm80211 driver

Folks, I've been testing out the newly Open Sourced Broadcom driver that's in the staging-next tree. Seems reliable, aside from suspend/resume (I posted one patch for handling radio is disabled on init hard crash). Sure, it'll hopefully land in staging and be in the rawhide kernel in due course,

Re: Broadcom brcm80211 driver

On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 16:19 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:37:28PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: I've been testing out the newly Open Sourced Broadcom driver that's in the staging-next tree. Seems reliable, aside from suspend/resume (I posted one patch for handling

Re: Broadcom brcm80211 driver

On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 16:56 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:11:50PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:37:28PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: Sure, it'll hopefully land in staging and be in the rawhide kernel in due course, but given that I'm

Re: up'ing /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches ?

On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:41 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: It's unfortunate that we have no way to determine at install time this is going to be a multiuser machine There are probably a bunch of other changes that a standalone desktop machine could make knowing that. No reason this couldn't be

PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64

No analysis yet. Just passing this along. Jon. --- begin oops log --- Halting system... BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0004 IP: [81017e7b] amd_pmu_cpu_offline+0x38/0x6b PGD 741d5067 PUD 77715067 PMD 0 Oops: [#1] SMP last sysfs file:

Re: [Fwd: opendir() on a file???]

On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 04:40 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: Now I might be missing something, and I know I'm behind on LKML[0], but the following isn't supposed to work in my book: Fixed in today's rawhide. Jon. ___ kernel mailing list kernel

recent rawhide network issues

Kyle, I think the recent issues were a result of the switch port that rawhide box is attached to getting confused due to the bridging and it being a very cheap switch (I have a Cisco, but it's loud and whiny and not in this room with me). I'll keep an eye on it, but pretty reproducibly I can just

unexplained panic tracking?

Folks, Is there any log of outstanding unexplained panics other than grepping bugzilla? I've got a box that falls over rarely and haven't got logs from it yet - just ordered a 48 port Cyclades TS 3000 so every box at home will shortly do remote serial logging to resolve this. Also, any plans to