kernel*-uname-r missing in rawhide kernels?

2014-05-20 Thread Sandro red Mathys
[red_trela@zalem ~]$ sudo yum update Error: package kernel-3.15.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc21.x86_64 requires kernel-core-uname-r = 3.15.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc21.x86_64, but none of the providers can be installed [red_trela@zalem ~]$ sudo yum update Downloads/kernel-* Error: package

Re: kernel*-uname-r missing in rawhide kernels?

2014-05-20 Thread Sandro red Mathys
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Sandro red Mathys r...@fedoraproject.org wrote: [red_trela@zalem ~]$ sudo yum update Error: package kernel-3.15.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc21.x86_64 requires kernel-core-uname-r = 3.15.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc21.x86_64, but none of the providers can be installed [red_trela

Re: New package naming scheme

2014-05-04 Thread Sandro red Mathys
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I actually meant to write this is not out for a vote because voting isn't going to fix anything. Anyway, -modules might be doable, but I have another bug to fix first. josh Looks like the renaming has hit rawhide

Preparing Change Proposal: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud - Feedback?

2014-03-14 Thread Sandro red Mathys
In the past ~24h, I've been preparing the Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud change. Before I submit it to the wrangler, I'm looking for everyone's feedback. Note this is my first change proposal so I might have misunderstood things or whatever.

Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

2014-03-14 Thread Sandro red Mathys
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 16:42:11 +0900, Sandro \red\ Mathys r...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Okay, I poked around in the yum source, yum docs and kernel packages a bit. So yum (and some testing confirms, dnf too) does

Re: Preparing Change Proposal: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud - Feedback?

2014-03-14 Thread Sandro red Mathys
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:52:15PM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote: In the past ~24h, I've been preparing the Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud change. Before I submit it to the wrangler, I'm looking

Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

2014-03-05 Thread Sandro red Mathys
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I'm not overly thrilled with having multi-tiered driver packages. That leads to major headaches when we start shuffling things around

Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

2014-03-05 Thread Sandro red Mathys
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:02:17AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 08:25:12PM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote: For example, lets start

Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

2014-03-05 Thread Sandro red Mathys
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: in general you need to multiply the wasted space for each instance Exactly, you usually have hundreds or even thousands of instances running. Sure,

Re: Cloud product kernel requirements

2013-10-30 Thread Sandro red Mathys
Josh, thanks to reaching out to us on this. It's good to know the kernel maintainers are willing to discuss this openly. On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi All, I realize the WG is just forming up and you have a lot of other items to cover for now,