Re: [PATCH] Add patch to let watchdog and perf work on Pentium4s (rhbz 713675)

2011-10-19 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 04:32:07PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:43:44PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
   Not sure what the patch prefence is for the mailing list.  This patch 
 applies
   to the fedpkg kernel git tree.  Better changelog below.
   
   Waiting on test feedback.
  
 Patch looks ok.  The bug is against f15, but I'm assuming we want this
 on all branches. (And amusingly, f15 gets the most rejects..)
 
 (16:24:26:davej@adamo:fedora-kernel)$ ./apply.sh f15 perf.diff 
 patching file kernel.spec
 Hunk #1 FAILED at 649.
 Hunk #2 FAILED at 1240.
 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel.spec.rej
 patching file x86-p4-make-watchdog-and-perf-work-together.patch

This should only be needed on f15.  Don probably diffed this before I
added a few commits to f15 yesterday afternoon.

josh
___
kernel mailing list
kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel


Re: [PATCH] Add patch to let watchdog and perf work on Pentium4s (rhbz 713675)

2011-10-19 Thread Don Zickus
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 04:32:07PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:43:44PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
   Not sure what the patch prefence is for the mailing list.  This patch 
 applies
   to the fedpkg kernel git tree.  Better changelog below.
   
   Waiting on test feedback.
  
 Patch looks ok.  The bug is against f15, but I'm assuming we want this
 on all branches. (And amusingly, f15 gets the most rejects..)

These are 3.1 backports, so I think just f15.  I assume f16 will go out
the door with 3.1?

 
 (16:24:26:davej@adamo:fedora-kernel)$ ./apply.sh f15 perf.diff 
 patching file kernel.spec
 Hunk #1 FAILED at 649.
 Hunk #2 FAILED at 1240.
 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel.spec.rej
 patching file x86-p4-make-watchdog-and-perf-work-together.patch

Yeah, sorry I wasn't sure if I should post the patch or the what I
committed to git.
 
 the spec rejects are pretty trivial of course, but do you want to just
 create a fedora account, for committing stuff like this ?
 Backports are usually non-controversial.

For some bizarre reason I am still enjoying other people committing my
patches. ;-p

I think I have a fedora account (maybe not commit permission), but it
doesn't matter to me.  Josh asked me to post, so I posted. :-)

Cheers,
Don
___
kernel mailing list
kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel