On 04/19/2017 04:22 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 20:04 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Found the issue and posted a patch upstream:
http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/2017-April/005441.html
That makes sure the minisymtab support skips kernel modules, which
is what generated
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 20:04 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Found the issue and posted a patch upstream:
> http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/2017-April/005441.html
> That makes sure the minisymtab support skips kernel modules, which
> is what generated the errors.
> [...]
> You need
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 06:59:38PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> This was explicitly causing problems for me when I was working.
> >> I think it was because it expected to find dynamic symbols
> >> and there were none.
> >
> > I'll do a kernel build with it enabled and see if I can figure out
On 04/12/2017 01:16 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 10:20 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 04/12/2017 03:55 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>> I am happy you seem able to use the defines instead of having to
>>> override the whole find-debuginfo call. Please let me know if there are
>>>
Hi Don,
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 13:45 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> Thanks for responding. Laura already provided some good feedback.
> I was curious if some of this would correctly for our non-kernel package
> stuff we build. I might be reading Laura's patch wrong, but I think some of
> the options
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 10:20 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 04/12/2017 03:55 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > I am happy you seem able to use the defines instead of having to
> > override the whole find-debuginfo call. Please let me know if there are
> > other defines you need/want.
> >
>
> I
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > Mark W.,
> >
> > Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with
> > the kernel?
> >
> > > @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires:
On 04/12/2017 03:55 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
>> Mark W.,
>>
>> Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with
>> the kernel?
>>
>>> @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires: pciutils-devel gettext ncurses-devel
Hi,
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> Mark W.,
>
> Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with
> the kernel?
>
> > @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires: pciutils-devel gettext ncurses-devel
> > BuildConflicts: rhbuildsys(DiskFree) < 500Mb
> >
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 06:22:06PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Once upon a time, the kernel needed a lot of special handling to
> generate proper debuginfo as the kernel was ahead in technology. These
> days, rpm has improved debuginfo support. The kernel has not kept up
> with this and it's
Once upon a time, the kernel needed a lot of special handling to
generate proper debuginfo as the kernel was ahead in technology. These
days, rpm has improved debuginfo support. The kernel has not kept up
with this and it's forward looking calls are now out of date. Switch to
more standard
11 matches
Mail list logo