Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-28 Thread Antonio Trande
I don't know if useful but during boot with kernel 3.0 appears: $ dmesg | grep multipath [4.113786] device-mapper: multipath: version 1.3.0 loaded [4.164462] device-mapper: multipath round-robin: version 1.0.0 loaded [ 35.443230] multipathd[1184]: /lib/udev/scsi_id exitted with 1 [

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-28 Thread Antonio Trande
You said that you saw the problem with Linux 3.0 too though? But only if fsck is enabled.. yet btrfs doesn't yet have a publicly available fsck... so you need to clarify your 3.0 comment earlier. It's only my doubt. Only one time i've tried to enable fsck on btrfs in fstab with Kernel 3.0 and

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-28 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Fri, Oct 28 2011 at 10:30am -0400, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know if useful but during boot with kernel 3.0 appears: $ dmesg | grep multipath [4.113786] device-mapper: multipath: version 1.3.0 loaded [4.164462] device-mapper: multipath round-robin:

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-28 Thread Antonio Trande
again there is no fsck for btrfs yet. so this doesn't make sense. You have ask me clarifications. I've just realized. Sorry. :) 2011/10/28 Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com On Fri, Oct 28 2011 at 11:11am -0400, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: You said that you saw the problem

Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-27 Thread Antonio Trande
Hello. After to have installed the lastest kernel (3.1-0-1) on my Fedora 16 x86_64bit, i get a kernel crash during boot. Now the main problem is how to recover 'boot log' or 'messages log' in order to ask help because it isnt created. With kernel 3.0-1-3 there is not problem. Maybe the crash

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-27 Thread Don Zickus
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:59:12PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: The digital picture are here: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/kernel-boot.tar.gz According to our DM guys this fix just missed 3.1 http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-block.git;a=commit;h=f26d8f0562da76731cb049943a0e9d9fa81d946a

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-27 Thread Don Zickus
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:29:56PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com writes: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:59:12PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: The digital picture are here: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/kernel-boot.tar.gz According to our DM guys this fix just

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-27 Thread Jeff Moyer
Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com writes: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:59:12PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: The digital picture are here: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/kernel-boot.tar.gz According to our DM guys this fix just missed 3.1

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-27 Thread Don Zickus
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:43:22PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: This doesn't look like the same problem. Here we've got BUG: scheduling while atomic. If it was the bug fixed by the above commits, then you would hit a BUG_ON. I would start looking at the btrfs bits to see if they're holding

Fwd: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-27 Thread Antonio Trande
-- Forwarded message -- From: Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com Date: 2011/10/27 Subject: Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash To: Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com Should i be the victim ? :) If need tests, i'm available. 2011/10/27 Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:20

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-27 Thread Vivek Goyal
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:20:51PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com writes: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:43:22PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: This doesn't look like the same problem. Here we've got BUG: scheduling while atomic. If it was the bug fixed by the above

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-27 Thread Vivek Goyal
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:09:05PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:43:22PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: This doesn't look like the same problem. Here we've got BUG: scheduling while atomic. If it was the bug fixed by the above commits, then you would hit a BUG_ON. I

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

2011-10-27 Thread Antonio Trande
do you have multipath configured on your box? If i have understand the 'multipath concept', yes. fdisk outputhttp://www.fpaste.org/KXvm/ How often can you reproduce this problem. Only with Kernel 3.1. If fsck is enabled on / partition (btrfs filesystem) also with Kernel 3.0 2011/10/27 Vivek