On 01/02/2018 03:39 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 12/08/2017 04:35 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 12/05/2017 12:50 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 11/28/2017 02:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time.
Part of this growth has come from building more
On 12/08/2017 04:35 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 12/05/2017 12:50 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 11/28/2017 02:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time.
Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace
tools that live under the
On 12/05/2017 12:50 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 11/28/2017 02:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time.
Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace
tools that live under the tools directory of the kernel. I've been
On 2017-12-05 3:50 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 11/28/2017 02:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time.
Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace
tools that live under the tools directory of the kernel. I've been
On 11/28/2017 02:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time.
Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace
tools that live under the tools directory of the kernel. I've been
experimenting with moving these to a separate spec
On 11/29/2017 10:33 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:03:16PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time.
Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace
tools that live under the tools directory of the kernel.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:03:16PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time.
> Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace
> tools that live under the tools directory of the kernel. I've been
> experimenting with moving
On 11/28/2017 06:16 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Are you looking for maintainers of this package? I know I've
volunteered in the past, and I'm happy to maintain it if nobody else
wants it.
josh
I was figuring the kernel team would continue to maintain it but
I would never object to someone else
On 11/29/2017 07:16 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 11/29/2017 10:07 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 11/28/2017 09:16 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Like all
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/2017 10:07 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>> On 11/28/2017 09:16 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Laura
On 11/29/2017 10:07 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> On 11/28/2017 09:16 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 09:16 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>> Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time.
>>> Part of this growth has
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time.
> Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace
> tools that live under the tools directory of the kernel. I've been
> experimenting
Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time.
Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace
tools that live under the tools directory of the kernel. I've been
experimenting with moving these to a separate spec file.
Advantages:
- Less stuff in the
14 matches
Mail list logo