I think we know almost the entire story now. See LP: #1656391
The one piece still missing is what changed. Very clearly the armhf
container tests passed for several months, and then stopped working. My
best guess is that they switched from using privileged containers to
unprivileged
LP: #1656391
And it's reproducible in an amd64 container run locally. So probably
some change in the images or lxc. Maybe a new missing dependency?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
If you run `dmsetup ls` as non-root on amd64, you get an error that's
close:
% dmsetup ls
/dev/mapper/control: open failed: Permission denied
Failure to communicate with kernel device-mapper driver.
Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136 (2016-11-05) and kernel driver (unknown
version).
Command
Found this older bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devmapper/+bug/105623
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655735
Title:
Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136
On Jan 11, 2017, at 08:10 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>Does the error go away if you boot a Xenial test kernel on this machine
>and re-run the test? That will tell us if it is a kernel regression.
We're a bit hardware starved atm, but trying to test this.
--
You received this bug notification
On Jan 11, 2017, at 06:30 PM, Brad Figg wrote:
>If, due to the nature of the issue you have encountered, you are unable
>to run this command, please add a comment stating that fact and change
>the bug status to 'Confirmed'.
This is probably a regression only on armhf, so the logs generated on
Removed unhelpful attachments and retagged to armhf.
** Also affects: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Public bug reported:
There is a new Zesty regression on armhf, related to the autopkgtest for
ubuntu-image. Here's a log of a recent run:
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac
/autopkgtest-zesty/zesty/armhf/u/ubuntu-
On Nov 15, 2016, at 07:24 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
>There are a couple of things in kern.log.1 with 4.8.0-26, but if the
>dates in the log can be trusted they're from about a week ago. One of
>them looks like the same issue as in bug 1630774, and that one has a fix
>in 4.8.0-28.30. That build is
** Attachment added: "kern.log.1"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1641976/+attachment/475/+files/kern.log.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
Interestingly, kern.log is empty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641976
Title:
Kernel panics and boot problems in Zesty
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
dmesg from a successful boot
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1641976/+attachment/474/+files/dmesg.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
FTR: OS X 10.11.6 fully updated
Fusion 8.5.2 (4635224)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641976
Title:
Kernel panics and boot problems in Zesty
Status in linux package
Okay, this is highly strange, and quite unpredictable.
Because the boot console output in Fusion scrolled off and can't be
captured (AFAICT), I don't have specifics, but there was definitely an
oops and a kernel crash. At the end of the output I saw something like
"recursive error fixed, reboot
4.8.0-27.29 from zesty-proposed does *not* fix the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641976
Title:
Kernel panics and boot problems in Zesty
Status in linux
This has returned for Zesty. LP: #1641976
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627198
Title:
4.8.0 kernels do not complete boot process on VM
Status in Linux:
Unknown
Public bug reported:
Back in Yakkety, I reported LP: #1627198 which described boot problems
with the 4.8.0 kernel on a VMware Fusion guest of Yakkety. With a fresh
install on Zesty, I'm seeing very similar boot problems.
With linux-image-generic 4.8.0.26.35, the system booted, but will not
Confirmed that Yakkety main kernel boots and logs into the desktop.
% uname -a
Linux anarchist 4.8.0-040800rc1-generic #201609281024 SMP Wed Sep 28 14:26:22
UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
% dpkg-query -W linux-image-generic
linux-image-generic 4.8.0.19.28
Thanks!
--
You received
Thanks for the extra details Seth.
Can you say whether it's the second problem that was breaking the desktop
coming up on login? IOW, I observed two problems. One was a freeze during
the boot process, and the other was a freeze during the login process
(although the latter wasn't a total
FWIW, I posted to the Fusion forums:
https://communities.vmware.com/message/2623359#2623359
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627198
Title:
4.8.0 kernels do not complete
On Sep 29, 2016, at 03:20 AM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
>1eccfa090eaea22558570054bbdc147817e1df5e
201609282035 boots, does not give me a desktop, and I see the crash in the
syslog.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
On Sep 28, 2016, at 11:06 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
>97433ea4fda62349bfa42089455593cbcb57e06c
201609281855 boots and gives me a desktop. No crash in usercopy.c found in
syslog.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
On Sep 28, 2016, at 02:39 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>It looks like we'll have to perform a second bisect, but also reverting
>commit 2deb4be2 between each step.
Just to follow up, I was able to eventually gain a desktop with the rc1 kernel
and the bad commit reverted. My current plan is to
On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:12 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>I built a mainline kenel with commit
>2deb4be28077638591fe5fc593b7f8aabc140f42 reverted.
>
>Can you test this kernel to see if it also has the new desktop issue?
That one gets a little farther but ultimately doesn't give me a desktop
either.
On Sep 27, 2016, at 09:15 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>Can you see if this kernel resolves this bug?
Almost! As mentioned in IRC, it boots but login doesn't give me a
desktop.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in
On Sep 27, 2016, at 08:28 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>The bisect reported the following as the first bad commit:
>
>commit 2deb4be28077638591fe5fc593b7f8aabc140f42
>Author: Andy Lutomirski
>Date: Thu Jul 14 13:22:55 2016 -0700
>
>x86/dumpstack: When OOPSing, rewind the
On Sep 27, 2016, at 03:32 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
>0f657262d5f99ad86b9a63fb5dcd29036c2ed916
Thanks. 201609271113 does *not* boot.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is
On Sep 26, 2016, at 11:36 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
>5048c2af078d5976895d521262a8802ea791f3b0
#201609261917 boots!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in
On Sep 26, 2016, at 10:52 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>I built the next test kernel, up to the following commit:
>52770c37db2c0ee5585dae2de3d19c8453f1e8dc
This one boots!
linux-image-4.7.0-040700-generic_4.7.0-040700.201609261819_amd64.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are
4.8 rc1 does not boot
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627198
Title:
4.8.0 kernels do not complete boot process on VM
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
On Sep 26, 2016, at 06:18 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>v4.5: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.5-wily/
>v4.6: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.6-yakkety/
>v4.7: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.7/
All of these kernels (amd64, generic) boot
On Sep 26, 2016, at 12:48 PM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
>Could you re-test with the 4.8.0-17.19 kernel we have in ppa:canonical-
>kernel-team/unstable
Unfortunately this kernel also fails to completely boot. The last things I
see in the console are
[ OK ] Started Login Service.
[ 36.445144]
Unfortunately, I cannot run this command on the system in question since
booting with the defective kernel never gives me a prompt or an ssh
login.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
** Summary changed:
- 4.4.8 kernels do not complete boot process on VM
+ 4.8.0 kernels do not complete boot process on VM
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627198
Title:
Public bug reported:
On my native amd64 box, 4.8.0-15 works just fine, but on my VMWare
Fusion 8.5 system, none of the 4.8.0 kernels complete the boot process.
I tried 4.8.0-15 from yakkety and 4.8.0-16 from yakkety-proposed.
Currently I am seeing the last message in my console at boot up as:
On Mar 11, 2014, at 10:15 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
This issue may have been introduced by the 3.13.6 stable update. Can
you test the following kernel and see if it also exhibits the bug:
I'm now on 3.13.0-17 and didn't notice the freeze on login after reboot to
this kernel. I'll try a few
3.13.0-17 seems to be freeze-free, so I'll close this bug for now.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289410
On Mar 12, 2014, at 07:31 AM, Neil Wilson wrote:
It would be as well to try it out - particularly as the package has been
updated recently.
Indeed. I installed it, timesync is enabled, removed ntp, and indeed after
about a 20m suspend, once resumed time syncs up again. Since I've not noticed
On Mar 11, 2014, at 07:56 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Is it safe to assume that other VMs - other Ubuntu releases, or other
distros, or windows, do not have this behavior?
I haven't tried other guest OSes. I'll give Debian and Windows 7 a try.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Public bug reported:
This may be a kernel bug, and I'll add a bug task for that.
% uname -a
Linux anarchist 3.13.0-15-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 3 15:54:59 UTC 2014
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
With this kernel, I can log in just fine. With -16 however, after I
type my password, the
% dpkg-query -W linux-image-generic
linux-image-generic 3.13.0.16.20
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289410
Title:
Xorg freeze
Status in “linux-meta” package
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1253498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253498
Public bug reported:
apt-get dist-upgrade
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: linux-image-3.12.0-3-generic 3.12.0-3.9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.12.0-3.8-generic 3.12.0
Uname:
Public bug reported:
After today's apt-get dist-upgrade:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.11.0-7-generic
W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/radeon/KAVERI_sdma.bin for module
radeon
W: Possible missing firmware
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1218691 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218691
Rebooted. No ill effects that I can see.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226025
I think this one can be closed.
% uname -a
Linux limelight 3.11.0-7-generic #13-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 10 20:55:38 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Everything works just fine with this kernel on this native desktop
machine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I think this one can be closed actually. With today's kernel update,
everything seems back to normal. However, if you still want me to test
some kernels for diagnostic purposes, just let me know.
% uname -a
Linux anarchist 3.11.0-7-generic #13-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 10 20:55:38 UTC 2013
x86_64
Public bug reported:
Two different problems on two different machines.
Virtual machine running in VMware Fusion 5: After today's kernel
upgrade, all fonts and windows are too small, from the greeter through
login and desktop. Rebooting to 3.0.11-5 fixes the problem. And I've
seen this before,
The Fusion VM is running this kernel successfully.
% uname -a
Linux anarchist 3.11.0-5-generic #11-Ubuntu SMP Fri Sep 6 19:01:31 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I'll open a separate bug for the greeter issue.
Thanks!
** Summary changed:
- Several regressions with 3.0.11-6
+ Tiny
On Sep 10, 2013, at 04:23 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
I started a bisect between 3.11.0-5.11 and 3.11.0-6.12. The bisect will
require the testing of about 4 test kernels.
I built the first kernel, which is up to commit:
264eca017cbbb23dd39a60697fff0bb019c31e2c
The test kernel can be downloaded
Public bug reported:
This is split off from LP: #1223352 which originally described two
different regressions I was seeing with 3.0.11-6. I've made that bug
about the Fusion VM tiny fonts issue. This one is about the native
install greeter problem.
Specifically, when booting into 3.0.11-6, the
50 matches
Mail list logo