[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1591167] Re: Bluetooth: hci0 link tx timeout with Intel Corporation Wireless 7260

2017-08-19 Thread Doug Morse
Just to be clear, these are the errors I'm seeing: root@n1:~# dmesg | grep -i blue [9.402011] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.21 [9.402031] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized [9.402034] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized [9.402037] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1591167] Re: Bluetooth: hci0 link tx timeout with Intel Corporation Wireless 7260

2017-08-19 Thread Doug Morse
I applied the patched /lib/firmware/intel/ibt- hw-37.7.10-fw-1.80.2.3.d.bseq as mentioned by @7oby in comment #4 on Ubuntu 16.04.3. No Joy. My control, is a newer: [9.468054] iwlwifi :02:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless AC 7265, REV=0x210 but the patched firmware seems to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1710941] Re: Bluetooth stopped working after update

2017-08-15 Thread Doug Morse
Thanks Daniel. Rolling back to kernel 4.4.0-87-generic #110-Ubuntu SMP seemed to fix the problem. Upgrading to 4.4.0-91 also seemed to cause other problems: My system started overheating, eventually slowed to a crawl (i.e., over a matter of minutes after each reboot slowed to the point of being

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1710941] [NEW] Bluetooth stopped working after update

2017-08-15 Thread Doug Morse
Public bug reported: Bluetooth connection to Bose Soundlink II have been fine for years. Applied a few new updates in the last day or two --- system was generally up to date, I don't often wait more than a week or so --- and now I can no longer connect. Removed the device and re-paired just

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1582213] Re: [xenial] Bluetooth device doesn't play any sound in A2DP mode unless set to HSP/HFP first

2017-06-05 Thread Doug Morse
@Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt): Thanks for your assistance! I am not Mary Sherman, and I'm continuing to experience this problem, even with the PPA and after rebooting. I didn't subscribe to this bug, I didn't even know about it. I report bug 1691556 and you marked it a duplicate of this one. As

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1582213] Re: [xenial] Bluetooth device doesn't play any sound in A2DP mode unless set to HSP/HFP first

2017-06-03 Thread Doug Morse
The problem appears to be with setting up the input sink, which I couldn't care less about. If any knows of a way for bluez / pulseaudio to force a device to just connect as an output-only device (e.g., normal bluetooth speaker), I think I'd be fine, as I have no problems with numerous other

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1582213] Re: [xenial] Bluetooth device doesn't play any sound in A2DP mode unless set to HSP/HFP first

2017-06-03 Thread Doug Morse
@hife and @Mary Sherman (spot9019): Thanks for the speedy replies! @hife: Thanks for describing your workaround in greater detail. I've already tried the a2dp.py script, it doesn't fix the problem for me. I just downloaded again the latest version and

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1582213] Re: [xenial] Bluetooth device doesn't play any sound in A2DP mode unless set to HSP/HFP first

2017-06-02 Thread Doug Morse
@hife and @Mary Sherman (spot9019): You both indicate that the latest pulse-testing ppa fixes the problem for you. Can you both indicate whether you are running Unity as the desktop or KDE or perhaps some other? I still have suspicions that there may be a permissions issue that is specific to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1582213] Re: [xenial] Bluetooth device doesn't play any sound in A2DP mode unless set to HSP/HFP first

2017-06-01 Thread Doug Morse
I must unfortunately report that that the recently reported fix does not work for me. Ubuntu 16.04 LTS connecting to Amazon Echo. Pulseaudio 1:8.0-0ubuntu3.3~xenial1, which is the latest presently available from ppa:ubuntu-audio-dev/pulse-testing as of today. The problem appears to result in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1691556] Re: Can't send audio to Amazon Echo via Bluetooth

2017-05-17 Thread Doug Morse
Additionally, this issue also appeared along the line with Ubuntu+KDE and apparently was easily resolved, as described in ubuntuforums.org, [link](https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2318966). Quoting another ubuntuforums.org post (also KDE),

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1691556] Re: Can't send audio to Amazon Echo via Bluetooth

2017-05-17 Thread Doug Morse
I should also note that on the askubuntu.com site, I speculate that it may just be some permission issue deep down somewhere, and why. ** Description changed: - Pairing and coupling to Amazon Echo works, but sound is heard. + Pairing and coupling to Amazon Echo works, but no sound is heard.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1691556] [NEW] Can't send audio to Amazon Echo via Bluetooth

2017-05-17 Thread Doug Morse
Public bug reported: Pairing and coupling to Amazon Echo works, but no sound is heard. I believe the issue is related to the fact that Amazon Echo is paired as a handset (i.e., speaker + microphone) rather than just as a speaker. I believe the critical error is found in a dmesg line such as:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1321938] Re: [Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 (rev. 3.0)] Ubuntu 12.04 LTS lshw sees 12gb RAM but system only using 8gb

2014-05-25 Thread Doug Morse
Hi Christopher, Yes, apparently it does. Kindly see the attached screenshot, which again shows 12gb using 'lshw' but 'free' and 'cat /proc/meminfo' show only 8gb. This is from having booted the iso file 'utopic-desktop- amd64+mac.iso' (downloaded yesterday) by installing grml-rescueboot and

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1321938] Re: [Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 (rev. 3.0)] Ubuntu 12.04 LTS lshw sees 12gb RAM but system only using 8gb

2014-05-25 Thread Doug Morse
Hi Christopher, I'm a bit confused. Don't you mean a reporting discrepancy between 'lshw' vs. '/proc' and procps tools like 'free'. BOTH 'free' and 'cat /proc/meminfo' show the WRONG info, whereas 'lshw' shows the correct info. Just to be clear, I'm rather confident that this is not a

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1321938] Re: [Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 (rev. 3.0)] Ubuntu 12.04 LTS lshw sees 12gb RAM but system only using 8gb

2014-05-25 Thread Doug Morse
Oops, forgort the dmesg.txt attachment, now attached here. ** Attachment added: dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1321938/+attachment/4119503/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1321938] Re: [Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 (rev. 3.0)] Ubuntu 12.04 LTS lshw sees 12gb RAM but system only using 8gb

2014-05-25 Thread Doug Morse
Hi Christopher, OK, great, thanks! And done (see results below). Unfortunatley, the problem is to be found in the upstream kernel as well. :( I'll change the tags as you direct momentarily. What happens next? Thanks, Doug - BEGIN: RESULTS FROM UPSTREAM KERNEL TEST - root@s3:~#

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1321938] Re: [Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 (rev. 3.0)] Ubuntu 12.04 LTS lshw sees 12gb RAM but system only using 8gb

2014-05-25 Thread Doug Morse
Kernel bug report emailed to linux...@kvack.org. I will report back with a Kernel Bug Tracker (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/) report URL once I have one. Thanks. ** Attachment added: kernel-bug-report.txt

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1321938] Re: [Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 (rev. 3.0)] Ubuntu 12.04 LTS lshw sees 12gb RAM but system only using 8gb

2014-05-25 Thread Doug Morse
Hi Christopher, Makes sense. Here is the requested URL for the upstream kernel bug report in their email list archives (linux-mm): http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmm=140105784328583w=2 The file 'kernel-bug-report.txt' I attached in my previous post contains the exact same information. Thanks, Doug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1321938] [NEW] Ubuntu 12.04 LTS lshw sees 12gb RAM but system only using 8gb

2014-05-21 Thread Doug Morse
Public bug reported: Hi, My motherboard died and Gigabyte had to replace it with a newer model (specifically, a GA-970A-UD3 replacing a GA-870A-UD3). After installing the replacement motherboard, the system boot and operated just fine. I did notice after a few days, however, that free and cat

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1321938] Re: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS lshw sees 12gb RAM but system only using 8gb

2014-05-21 Thread Doug Morse
Oops, I should have also mentioned: Of course, all 12gb were being recognized before the motherboard (MB) replacement. No kernel updates or any other kind of updates were applied during the 2-3 day period between when I installed the new MB and noticed the lacking 4gb of RAM. I did force a