[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1098961] Re: PAE regression: OOM with just a few sleeps

2014-09-25 Thread Paul Szabo
Following a suggestion in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695182#513 I tested older kernels: seems that PAE was always (or at least back to karmic 2.6.31) prone to OOM under the sleep test. Curiously I found that non-PAE kernels of that vintage might also OOM, maybe depending on

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1098961] Re: PAE regression: OOM with just a few sleeps

2014-09-17 Thread Paul Szabo
Should a CVE be assigned, seeing how this issue causes a DoS? And then a USN/DSA should be issued when eventually solved. Should it be reported to SecurityFocus and obtain a BID? Could the Status be changed to something better than Expired? Would some kind soul confirm and explicitly state that

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1098961] Re: PAE regression: OOM with just a few sleeps

2014-09-16 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098961 Title: PAE regression: OOM with just a few sleeps Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Expired Bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1098961] Re: PAE regression: OOM with just a few sleeps

2014-09-15 Thread Paul Szabo
Now at Ubuntu VERSION=14.04.1 LTS, Trusty Tahr seems that the one-and-only x86 kernel offered is with PAE, so I cannot easily demonstrate the difference between PAE and non-PAE kernels. With the PAE kernel, my machine produces an OOM crash with the test command bash -c 'n=0; while [ $n -lt

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1098961] Re: PAE regression: OOM with just a few sleeps

2013-10-10 Thread Paul Szabo
Expired? That is weird... how come it did not expire between comments#18 and comments#19, between 16Jan and 6Aug? Anyway the bug is alive... as anyone could easily test, with a simple bash -c 'n=0; while [ $n -lt 33000 ]; do sleep 600 ((n=n+1)); ((m=n%500)); if [ $m -lt 1 ]; then echo -n $n -

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1098961] Re: PAE regression: OOM with just a few sleeps

2013-10-09 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1098961] Re: PAE regression: OOM with just a few sleeps

2013-08-08 Thread Paul Szabo
Dear Christopher, Thanks for the hint about the BIOS. I updated it, the BIOS version went from 2.2.1 to 2.4.0. With the new BIOS and running non-PAE kernel: psz@DellE520:~$ uname -a Linux DellE520 3.2.0-51-generic #77-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 24 20:21:10 UTC 2013 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1098961] Re: PAE regression: OOM with just a few sleeps

2013-08-08 Thread Paul Szabo
Dear Christopher, ... test the latest upstream kernel ... Did not I do that already in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1098961/comments/18 ? Is there really a need to re-test? (Yes I know that the kernel now is different from what I tested... but unless you know that

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1098961] Re: PAE regression: OOM with just a few sleeps

2013-08-06 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Paul Szabo, as per http://www.dell.com/support/drivers/us/en/19/driverdetails?driverid=R157196 an update is available for your BIOS (2.4.0). If you update to this, does it change anything? If not, could you please both specify what happened, and provide the output of the following terminal