[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384746] Re: Support multiple versions of AppArmor policy cache files

2022-02-12 Thread John Johansen
Indeed https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1384746/comments/2 should be tracked else where. It really should split out into two separate tracking issues. 1. either generating the feature file from the kernel on build. To track this I have opened

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384746] Re: Support multiple versions of AppArmor policy cache files

2022-02-12 Thread intrigeri
It seems to me this was fixed & released a while ago. https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1384746/comments/2 could be tracked on a new, follow-up bug, if still desired. ** Changed in: apparmor Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384746] Re: Support multiple versions of AppArmor policy cache files

2014-10-28 Thread Tyler Hicks
** Changed in: apparmor Status: Triaged = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1384746 Title: Support multiple versions of AppArmor policy cache files

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384746] Re: Support multiple versions of AppArmor policy cache files

2014-10-23 Thread Tyler Hicks
Once the AppArmor parser supports multiple, versioned policy cache files I will be adding the ability to generate the policy cache files at kernel postinst. This will involve shipping a flattened AppArmor features file in the Ubuntu kernel packages and then calling out to apparmor_parser and

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384746] Re: Support multiple versions of AppArmor policy cache files

2014-10-23 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1384746 Title: Support multiple versions of AppArmor policy cache