[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384955] Re: support compressed kernels on arm64

** Changed in: linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384955] Re: support compressed kernels on arm64

** Changed in: flash-kernel (Ubuntu) Assignee: dann frazier (dannf) => Kaelan Harrison (flyboy88) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1384955 Title: support compressed

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384955] Re: support compressed kernels on arm64

This bug was fixed in the package debian-installer - 20101020ubuntu451.10 --- debian-installer (20101020ubuntu451.10) xenial; urgency=medium [ dann frazier ] * arm64/xgene-uboot: Set the correct compression flag when generating a uImage of a gzip'd kernel. LP: #1384955. *

Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384955] Re: support compressed kernels on arm64

On Feb 8, 2017 08:06, "Robie Basak" <1384...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: Are there any other systems that use flash-kernel that need to be considered in the test plan and regression potential sections? >From a flash-kernel perspective, based on the patch it seems to me that the decision to use a

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384955] Re: support compressed kernels on arm64

This bug was fixed in the package flash-kernel - 3.0~rc.4ubuntu62.2 --- flash-kernel (3.0~rc.4ubuntu62.2) xenial; urgency=medium * Add support for gzip-compressed kernel images (LP: #1384955) -- dann frazier Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:21:47 -0700 ** Changed in:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384955] Re: support compressed kernels on arm64

I verified this by: - MAAS deploying an HP ProLiant m400 system w/ xenial - enabling proposed - adding ppa:canonical-kernel-team/unstable (for next step) - installing linux-image-extra-4.8.0-37-generic 4.8.0-37.39~16.04.2 - verified that the previous step caused flash-kernel from proposed to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384955] Re: support compressed kernels on arm64

Are there any other systems that use flash-kernel that need to be considered in the test plan and regression potential sections? >From a flash-kernel perspective, based on the patch it seems to me that the decision to use a compressed kernel is outside the package, so I don't see a regression

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384955] Re: support compressed kernels on arm64

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Whitcroft (apw) ** Also affects: linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) ** Changed in: linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) =>

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384955] Re: support compressed kernels on arm64

** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/debian-installer/xenial-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1384955 Title: support compressed kernels on arm64 Status in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384955] Re: support compressed kernels on arm64

This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.8.0-11.12 --- linux (4.8.0-11.12) yakkety; urgency=low * change_hat is logging failures during expected hat probing (LP: #1615893) - SAUCE: apparmor: Fix auditing behavior for change_hat probing * deleted files outside of the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1384955] Re: support compressed kernels on arm64

** Summary changed: - flash-kernel should support compressed kernels + support compressed kernels on arm64 ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: