--- Comment From pt...@cn.ibm.com 2016-07-25 02:41 EDT---
(In reply to comment #15)
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:19:34AM -, bugproxy wrote:
> > I don't think this bug should be fixed with makedumpfile. I think it
> > should be fixed with kdump-tools.
>
> makedumpfile is the name of the
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:19:34AM -, bugproxy wrote:
> I don't think this bug should be fixed with makedumpfile. I think it
> should be fixed with kdump-tools.
makedumpfile is the name of the source package which builds kdump-tools.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
--- Comment From pt...@cn.ibm.com 2016-07-25 01:18 EDT---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
>
> Accepted makedumpfile into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
> be available at
>
--- Comment From ru...@us.ibm.com 2016-06-09 12:28 EDT---
This bug has been quiet for a couple of months now. Just pinging for status.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From hbath...@in.ibm.com 2016-04-12 07:47 EDT---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Hello,
>
Hi Louis,
> I am not against the modification but would like to understand better the
> rationale behind this. According to the kernel doc we have :
The rationale behind moving from maxcpus=1
5 matches
Mail list logo
