Basic VRF support landed in netplan v0.105:
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/285
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: maas
Milestone: next => None
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737428
Title:
VRF support to solve routing problems associated with multi-homing
Status
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.network.html#VRF=
VRF= The name of the VRF to add the link to. See systemd.netdev(5).
vrf A Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) interface to create separate
routing and forwarding domains.
[VRF] Section Options
The [VRF] section only
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:04:28PM -, Billy Olsen wrote:
> @bjornt Are you going to copy it over to the MAAS discourse feature set
> then?
We would prefer that one of the stakeholders actually would add it to
discourse. That will ensure that the stakeholders are still in the loop,
if there
@bjornt Are you going to copy it over to the MAAS discourse feature set
then?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737428
Title:
VRF support to solve routing problems
This sounds great, but it's not a bug report. It's a feature request.
For MAAS, we track feature requests at
https://discourse.maas.io/c/features, so I'm going to mark this bug
report as Invalid for MAAS.
** Changed in: maas
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug
** Tags added: sts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737428
Title:
VRF support to solve routing problems associated with multi-homing
Status in juju:
Incomplete
Status
Sandor,
Not on the VRF usage side but there is a feature in MAAS 2.6 to have a
better way to work in multi-homed environments (for bionic+ machines):
https://docs.maas.io/2.6/en/intro-new
"Networking - Multiple default gateways"
It relies on "routing policy database" (RPDB) functionality
Any news or progress on these issues now that we are a year and a half
into this bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737428
Title:
VRF support to solve routing problems
BUMP! +1000 for this feature. We need vrf support in MAAS to be able to
use it with in bgp/vrf stack. @dmitriis thank you for the thorough write
up and detailed explanation of the problem/solution here!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is
John,
Interfaces of a host carry enough information to be used to make routing
decisions - that's the core idea of host and router-side VRF
implementations. Network spaces as of now do not help you to solve
routing problems in any way unless you have one big L2 network and
"routing" is done
It would be good to have a clearer discussion of what issues you are
running into with routes. There are several ways that we *could* tackle the
issue. Static Routes was the mechanism that we started modeling because
that was the ask from the field (because, as-I-understand, that was the
solution
I'd like to chime in and add that this is something that we've been
missing in our Juju and MAAS deployment of OpenStack.
One of our problem area for example is properly routing management,
storage and public traffic for our OpenStack deployment without complex
static rules and a lot of annoying
Marking as Incomplete Wishlist as per 'maas'
** Changed in: juju
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: juju
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
Andres,
I'm not going to be at the sprint but the problems described need a
proper solution in MAAS and Juju at least from the end host perspective.
Similar to how VLANs are supported natively in MAAS & Juju, L3
virtualization technologies like VRF should be as well. I hope the
information I will
** Description changed:
Problem description:
* a host is multi-homed if it has multiple network interfaces with L3
addresses configured (physical or virtual interfaces, natural to
OpenStack regardless of IPv4/IPv6 and IPv6 in general);
+
+ (see 3.3.4 Local Multihoming
+
** Tags added: kernel-da-key
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737428
Title:
VRF support to solve
Hi Dimitrii,
This request seems like something we have never seen before. This
doesn't seem to be quite a complex thing to do. Right now, this is and
never has been in our plans to implement. This is also something that
has never come up before.
I'm going to mark this as a wishlist, and
** Description changed:
Problem description:
* a host is multi-homed if it has multiple network interfaces with L3
addresses configured (physical or virtual interfaces, natural to
OpenStack regardless of IPv4/IPv6 and IPv6 in general);
* if all hosts that need to participate in L3
For Ubuntu kernel this is a backport request.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737428
Title:
VRF support to solve routing problems associated with multi-homing
Status in
21 matches
Mail list logo
