[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1881109] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-01-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-01-13 09:51 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla -> closed, Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881109 Title: [Ubuntu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1881109] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-21 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From max.bend...@ibm.com 2020-12-21 10:42 EDT--- We have re-run our test suite that originally produces this bug consistently and again were unable to reproduce. It looks like this issue has been fixed on the latest kernel. ``` bender@zt93ke:~$ uname -a Linux zt93ke

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1881109] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-09-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-09-16 09:02 EDT--- @CAN: Will the patch mentioned in LP comment #8 be used to build the kernel referenced above made it into the regular Ubuntu kernel? Many thx in advance -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1881109] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-07-09 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-07-09 06:00 EDT--- IBM: We can't possibly generally recommend turning WBT off. What is Canonicals position, to solve this situation? Many thanks in advance -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1881109] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-06-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bbl...@de.ibm.com 2020-06-17 06:59 EDT--- O.K. we have some new insights here. @ali.hai...@ibm.com did some experiments on my behalf with a slightly modified Ubuntu kernel (based on 5.4.0-29) where I removed commit 3060781f2664 ("s390/qdio: allow to scan all Output SBALs

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1881109] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-05-28 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bbl...@de.ibm.com 2020-05-28 14:37 EDT--- (In reply to comment #20) > Hi Benjamin, > if it's an issue somewhere in scsi-midlayer/block-layer/wbt wouldn't it then > also happen with zFCP on DS8k and on other patforms? > So far we did some testing with zFCP on DS8k (the only

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1881109] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-05-28 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bbl...@de.ibm.com 2020-05-28 12:14 EDT--- (In reply to comment #18) > > I did a little research, and it is indeed possible to disable WBT during > runtime, its just a bit un-userfriendly for lots of disks, so I wrote a > quick`n`dirty udev-rule file. > > Is it possible for