[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04

2016-09-22 Thread Balbir Singh
FYI, I think the patch made it to 4.4 stable as well -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04 Status in li

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04

2016-09-16 Thread Balbir Singh
Can we build the latest 4.8, may be we should wait for 4.8-rc7. I've got all the fixes upstream, with the latest being 135e8c9250dd5c8c9aae5984fde6f230d0cbfeaf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04

2016-09-13 Thread Balbir Singh
Can we please get answers to 1, 2 and 4 for comment #128. Also Kalpana has a request for a new kernel build. Thanks, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04

2016-09-04 Thread Balbir Singh
Thank you for the excellent summary. Questions 1. Can we get the configurations of the machines. 2. The first column is the number of times the test ran? 3. I see that 4.4.0-31-generic-50-Ubuntu passed on all machines across several runs, is that true? 4. Did any of the tests result in system han

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04

2016-08-30 Thread Balbir Singh
I just posted another patch @ http://www.mail-archive.com/linux- ker...@vger.kernel.org/msg1219903.html, I am testing this patch at the moment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04

2016-08-18 Thread Balbir Singh
Thanks Jeff. I see that the ARM64 might have failed - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1610320 Can we know the git commit id that fixed the ARM64 failure in mainline? BTW, could you please share the full machine configurations - threads+RAM+swap for each of the other architect

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1610320] Re: stress-ng memory testing causes Arm64 system to hang

2016-08-18 Thread Balbir Singh
Do we know what change fixed the issue? commit id? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1610320 Title: stress-ng memory testing causes Arm64 system to hang Status in linux pac

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04

2016-08-18 Thread Balbir Singh
These logs are something I've not seen here in my testing. This shows that we are stuck doing an up_write() on root->rwsem in the anon_vma path. It looks like we are contending on the rwsem's sem->wait_lock. I don't have a reproduction of this issue, it will be interesting to examine what is causin

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04

2016-08-17 Thread Balbir Singh
I am unable to reproduce the failure either, but your system with 32G and 128 threads seems like the test would start 128 hogs each hogging up 32GB. How much swap do you have on them? Could you post the dmesg to see what failed and the logs around it? It looks like the stack stressor failed. -- Y

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04

2016-08-15 Thread Balbir Singh
Can I quickly check if the oom_reaper patches are there in the built kernel or is it just the fix I posted? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04

2016-08-14 Thread Balbir Singh
Had several other runs of success. I would like to see runs from others as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04

2016-08-11 Thread Balbir Singh
At my end, I ran two runs with success. More runs in progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04

2016-08-10 Thread Balbir Singh
I just looked at the directory and I can find just the arm64 kernel. Could you please confirm if I am looking at the right thing and at the right place? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04

2016-07-06 Thread Balbir Singh
Sorry the 14.04 should be 16.04 in comment #61 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04 Status i

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04

2016-07-05 Thread Balbir Singh
I have 14.04 installed with 4.4.0-28 and I can see the following In the bad case 1. OOM'ing of stress-ng-brk is slow, I can see it making progress -- see tasks being scheduled/console output and sysrq output on Ctrl-o h 2. stress-ng-brk is trying to make progress in OOM, but is heavily contenti